Back

Accelerated MCDW-pCASL Using Subspace Low-Rank Reconstruction for Quantification of BBB Water Exchange and Permeability

Liu, Z.; Zhao, C.; Huang, Z.; Guo, F.; Wang, D. J.; Shao, X.

2026-07-16 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.07.13.26357046 medRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose: To develop an accelerated motion-compensated diffusion-weighted pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (MCDW-pCASL) method using a spatial subspace low-rank reconstruction method for efficient quantification of blood-brain barrier (BBB) water exchange (kw) and permeability (PSw). Methods: An accelerated multidelay MCDW-pCASL sequence was developed to simultaneously encode intravascular and extravascular diffusion-weighted ASL signals across multiple post-labeling delays (PLDs). A spatial subspace low-rank reconstruction framework was optimized to enable joint estimation of cerebral blood flow (CBF) and BBB water exchange rate and permeability. Fourteen young healthy adults underwent test-retest scans (separated by ~1 week) at 3T with both the accelerated MCDW-pCASL and a conventional diffusion-prepared (DP) pCASL sequence. Whole-brain, gray-matter, and white-matter CBF and kw values were quantified to assess test-retest repeatability and cross-method agreement. An additional cohort of 30 older adults underwent single-session MCDW and DP scans to evaluate age-related perfusion and BBB kw/PSw differences. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess reliability and agreement. Results: Accelerated MCDW-pCASL demonstrated excellent agreement with DP-pCASL for CBF (ICC = 0.89) and fair agreement for kw (ICC = 0.56). Test-retest repeatability of MCDW-pCASL was good for CBF, BBB kw and PSw (ICC {approx} 0.6). Across both sequences, younger subjects exhibited significantly higher CBF and kw compared with older adults. Conclusion: Incorporating a spatial low-rank subspace reconstruction enables accelerated MCDW-pCASL acquisition with reliable simultaneous quantification of CBF, BBB kw and PSw. Clinical applications of this method for assessing perfusion and BBB function are warranted.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.