Back

Host-related concordance of TAC/SARIFA in colorectal double and triple carcinomas suggests patient-specific metabolic reprogramming

Farfan Lopez, F. J.; Wiegering, A.; Maerkl, B.; Waidhauser, J.; Krebs, M.; Grosser, B.; Reitsam, N. G.; Probst, A.; Matthias Schrempf, M.; Schenkirsch, G.; Rosenwald, A.; Kurz, F.

2026-07-13 pathology
10.64898/2026.07.12.26357852 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction. TAC/SARIFA has been introduced as a new robust and easy-to-evaluate biomarker in several cancer entities, including colorectal cancer. It is defined by direct contact between at least five tumour cells and one adipocyte and is believed to indicate metabolic reprogramming associated with adverse outcome. However, the mechanism that leads to TAC/SARIFA positivity remains unclear. To investigate whether there is an individual component, we conducted a study on double and triple cancers, establishing a within patient design. Methods. We retrospectively analysed a total of 135 cases with 276 colorectal cancers from two academic medical centres. The TAC/SARIFA status was evaluated, as were the basic histopathological factors. The median follow-up time was 120 months. Results. Cases with any TAC/SARIFA positive tumours showed significantly reduced overall survival (62 vs. 88 months; p = 0.011). Analysing the entire cohort, the rates of concordant and discordant cases followed a random distribution. However, restricting the analysis to synchronous pT3/4 cases revealed a significant deviation from a random distribution (p = 0.016). Conclusion. This study reveals significant concordance of TAC/SARIFA status in synchronous locally advanced colorectal double/triple carcinomas, supporting the concept that tumour adipocyte interaction reflects a host related microenvironmental condition linked to metabolic reprogramming rather than a purely tumour intrinsic event.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.1%
2
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.6%
3
The Journal of Pathology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
4
Molecular Oncology
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.5%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.2%
7
Journal of Clinical Pathology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
8
The American Journal of Pathology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
9
Translational Oncology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
10
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
11
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.0%
12
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
European Journal of Immunology
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
14
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.9%
15
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
16
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Biology
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
19
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
20
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
21
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
22
Cancer Letters
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%