Back

Dissecting antibiosis resistance to Phthorimaea absoluta in wild and cultivated tomato accessions

Amegan, K. E.; Magot, F.; Desneux, N.; Del-Valle, S.; Salgon, S.; Kergunteuil, A.; Caromel, B.; Larbat, R.; Lavoir, A.-V.

2026-07-13 plant biology
10.64898/2026.07.11.737942 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AbstractTomato production faces a persistent challenge from the tomato leaf miner, Phthorimaea absoluta, a pest that severely limits yields while effective resistance in cultivated varieties remains scarce. To address this gap, wild tomato relatives represent a promising reservoir of resistance traits. In this study, 24 tomato accessions, including both cultivated types and wild species, were evaluated under greenhouse (no-choice) and tunnel (choice) conditions. Resistance mechanisms were characterized through measures of antibiosis such as leaflet lesion type, proportion of attacked leaflets, and mine density. The results revealed substantial variation between and within species, allowing classification of accessions into resistant, intermediate, and susceptible groups through multivariate analysis. Notably, the wild accession Solanum habrochaites PI248707 exhibited strong resistance, in contrast to susceptible cultivated varieties such as Rose de Berne. Under choice conditions, PI248707 sustained limited damage and disrupted larval development, with early instar larvae present but few reaching advanced stages, indicating an inhibitory defense response. Untargeted metabolomic profiling further highlighted pronounced constitutive differences between wild and cultivated accessions, with S. pennellii and S. habrochaites displaying higher metabolic diversity. By integrating phenotypic and metabolic data, specific metabolite classes associated with resistance were identified. These findings underscore the potential of wild tomato germplasm in breeding programs, with PI248707 standing out as a strong candidate for resistance introgression.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 17%
11.7%
2
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
11.7%
3
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
4
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
5
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.1%
6
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
7
Plant Disease
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
8
Plants
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.2%
10
Plant Stress
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
11
Horticulture Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
12
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
13
Pest Management Science
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
14
Plant Pathology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
15
Plant Science
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
16
Phytopathology®
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
18
Planta
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
19
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
20
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
21
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
22
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
23
Plant Biotechnology Journal
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
24
Physiologia Plantarum
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
25
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
26
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
27
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
57 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
28
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Plant Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
30
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%