Back

Genome-wide association analysis reveals new loci for leaf water status, biomass and plant architectural traits in bread wheat under rainfed conditions

Rustamova, S.; Jahangirov, A.; Gurbanova, U.; Khudayev, F.; Leon, J.; Naz, A. A.; Huseynova, I.

2026-07-16 genetics
10.64898/2026.07.11.737917 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Drought during reproductive development and grain filling is a major constraint to bread wheat productivity in rainfed environments. In the present study, we employed genome-wide association analysis in an untapped diversity panel of wheat genotypes relevant to natural dryland conditions. A total of 186 genotypes were evaluated for drought-related physiological, biomass, and architectural traits under terminal rainfed stress in Azerbaijan. Relative water content, plant height, fresh weight, dry weight, flag leaf length, and flag leaf width were assessed at the milk ripening stage. These data were subjected to genome-wide association analysis using 19,737 SNP markers to identify loci and epistatic interactions involved in the determination of these traits. The panel showed broad phenotypic variation and significant genotypic effects for all traits, with broad-sense heritability ranging from 0.991 for plant height to 0.385 for flag leaf width. GWAS identified a major locus for relative water content on chromosome 2D at SNP marker AX-86184518, which explained 11.94% of the genotypic variation. Candidate-gene analysis highlighted the proximal WEB-family-like gene TraesCS2D03G1001000 as the main candidate gene. Plant height showed strong additive loci, mainly on chromosomes 2A and 4A, whereas biomass and flag leaf traits showed suggestive additive loci and epistatic interactions. These findings provide candidate loci and interaction patterns in the genetic make-up of essential traits, which may facilitate indirect selection in breeding new varieties.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.