Back

Far-red timing uncovers cultivar-dependent yield and bolting responses in vertical-farm spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)

McGovern, C.; Adrio, M.; Aliki, H.; Vichos, R.; Powell, W.; Sharma, R.

2026-07-13 plant biology
10.64898/2026.07.10.737849 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Far-red light (FR; 700-750 nm) is increasingly incorporated into controlled-environment lighting because it can improve photosynthetic efficiency when combined with comparatively shorter wavelengths. In long-day leafy crops such as spinach, however, FR may also promote the transition from vegetative to reproductive growth and thereby reduce marketable yield. Most studies have evaluated FR fraction, intensity or end-of-day exposure, whereas the developmental timing of FR has rarely been tested, particularly in spinach. Here, we evaluated six commercial spinach cultivars (Amador, Harp, Renegade, Responder, Rubino and Santa Cruz) in an indoor vertical farm under a common red-green-blue background (PPFD 260-264 {micro}mol m-{superscript 2} s-{superscript 1}, 12 h photoperiod, 24 {degrees}C) and four FR timing treatments: no FR (Control), FR throughout production (FullFR), FR during early development only (EarlyFR), and FR during late development only (LateFR). LateFR increased marketable fresh weight relative to Control (244 vs 224 g) and reduced flowering incidence, whereas far-red supplied during early development reduced fresh weight (158 g) and increased flowering. The magnitude of the timing response differed among cultivars: switching from EarlyFR to LateFR recovered 0 % fresh weight in Amador but 107 % in Renegade and Rubino, with the largest penalties occurring in otherwise bolt-resistant cultivars. EarlyFR also increased total chlorophyll and reduced the chlorophyll a:b ratio. These results show that FR response in spinach is strongly conditioned by developmental stage and cultivar. Although LateFR received more total far-red than EarlyFR, it behaved like the Control, indicating that the penalty was set by far-red timing rather than dose. Treatment differences in bolting and yield tracked an estimated phytochrome photostationary-state deficit during early development: a phytochrome-deficit model markedly outperformed a cumulative-dose model ({Delta}AIC = 441), and the deficit x cultivar interaction was strong (p < 0.001), with bolt-resistant cultivars losing most yield when far-red coincided with the early developmental window. We therefore propose that FR should be treated as a genotype-dependent management variable rather than as a fixed spectral input, with late application and bolt-resistant cultivars offering the most favourable combination for vertical-farm spinach production. Framed within the breeders equation, the close match between the trial and production environment and the scope for shorter breeding cycles indoors suggest that genotype and far-red timing can be optimised jointly to accelerate genetic gain.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.9%
2
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
11.3%
3
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.0%
4
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
5
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
6
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Physiologia Plantarum
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
8
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
9
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
10
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
11
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
13
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
14
Plants
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
15
Plant Stress
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
16
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Plant Methods
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
18
Phytopathology®
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
19
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
20
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
21
Environmental and Experimental Botany
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
22
Planta
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
23
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
24
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
25
Plant Pathology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
26
Plant Science
31 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
27
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
29
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
30
Photochemistry and Photobiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%