Back

Text guidance is powerful but prompt-sensitive for weakly-supervised leaf symptom segmentation

Dubois, R.; Bousset, L.; Jumel, S.; Leclerc, M.; Parisey, N.; Joly, A.

2026-07-10 plant biology
10.64898/2026.07.10.737680 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Accurate segmentation of plant disease symptoms is essential for crop monitoring and phenotyping, yet it typically requires costly pixel-level annotations. Weakly supervised semantic segmentation (WSSS) alleviates this burden using image-level labels, but its performance depends on the quality of spatial priors such as class activation maps (CAMs). We investigate whether text-guided segmentation with the Segment Anything Model 3 (SAM3) can serve as an alternative weak supervision signal. Three pseudo-mask generation strategies are compared: (i) CAMs refined with SAM or SAM3, (ii) zero-shot text-guided SAM3, and (iii) a hybrid approach combining weak spatial cues with text prompts. The resulting pseudo-masks are used to train a DeepLabV3 model. Text guidance alone matches or outperforms conventional WSSS, achieving up to 0.46 IoU without spatial supervision and 0.61 IoU on a public dataset, although performance is sensitive to text prompt formulation. The hybrid strategy improves robustness, reaching 0.50 IoU on the primary dataset and 0.58 IoU on the additional dataset while reducing prompt sensitivity. Overall, text guidance is a promising alternative to conventional weak supervision, while hybrid approaches provide a more robust solution for plant disease segmentation.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.8%
2
Plant Phenomics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 27%
5.5%
4
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature Plants
94 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.1%
6
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
7
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
8
Quantitative Plant Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
9
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
10
Plant Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
12
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.9%
13
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
The Plant Cell
161 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Development
497 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
16
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
in silico Plants
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
18
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
19
Plant Methods
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
21
Applications in Plant Sciences
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
23
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.9%
24
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.6%