Back

Temporal, spatial, and parasitic drivers of microbial variation in European honey bees

Rossier, V.; Leroy, T.; Engel, P.; Neuditschko, M.; Dietemann, V.; Dainat, B.

2026-07-10 microbiology
10.64898/2026.07.10.737668 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Although the roles of host-associated microbiomes in animal health are increasingly recognised, the factors influencing their variation remain understudied. The relatively simple microbiome of honey bees is a relevant system to address this gap. In particular, the relationship between variations in microbiome composition and the ectoparasite Varroa destructor, the main threat to honey bee health worldwide, is poorly established. In this study, we used metagenomic and statistical analyses of 1442 European honey bee colonies to investigate the relationships between the honey bee microbiome, temporality, location, V. destructor load, and behavioural response to its infestation by the host. While season, year, and location were identified as the main drivers of microbiome variation, V. destructor load emerged as a significant factor associated with microbiome variation. Notably, we identify several pathogens and opportunists that correlated positively with V. destructor load, while the core symbiont Bombilactobacillus correlated negatively. This is compatible with a shift in the microbiome toward dysbiosis, which may be driven by or promote V. destructor parasitism. By contrast, we found only limited evidence of an association between the microbiome and resistance behaviours of the host against this parasite. While the study cannot establish causal relationships, we present the largest metagenomic analysis of honey bee microbiomes to date, providing robust, generalisable evidence about the factors driving variation in the microbiome composition of this ecologically and economically important pollinator. These findings may serve as additional markers in selective breeding programs targeting V. destructor resistance, which could ultimately improve honey bee health.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
12.6%
2
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.8%
3
Animal Microbiome
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 16%
5.5%
5
Microbial Ecology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
6
Environmental Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.4%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.1%
8
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
9
BMC Microbiology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
10
The ISME Journal
228 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
11
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.6%
12
Environmental Microbiology Reports
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
13
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
14
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.1%
15
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.0%
16
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
17
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
19
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
Insects
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
21
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
22
Journal of Invertebrate Pathology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
23
Animal Behaviour
73 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
24
Microbiome
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
25
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
26
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
27
Environmental Microbiome
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
28
International Journal for Parasitology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
29
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%
30
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%