Back

Field-Correcting GRAPPA (FCG): a technique to correctspatiotemporal-varying phase errors in Echo Planar Imaging

Wang, N.; Abraham, D.; Shah, Z.; Lin, Y.; Cao, X.; Wu, H.; Polimeni, J.; Huber, R.; Liu, Q.; Ning, L.; Rathi, Y.; Westin, C.-F.; Mattern, H.; Speck, O.; Yang, B.; Abad, N.; Liao, C.; Kerr, A.; Setsompop, K.

2026-07-10 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.07.10.737642 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose: To develop a Field-Correcting GRAPPA (FCG) technique to correct the spatiotemporal-varying phase errors in EPI caused by eddy currents. Methods: The fast-changing gradient in EPI causes strong eddy current effects and associated spatiotemporal-varying phase errors, producing significant image artifacts. The use of higher gradient amplitude, slew rate, and ramp sampling factor for faster imaging exacerbates this problem. In this work, FCG was developed to address this challenge by using a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) to provide a compact representation of a family of GRAPPA-like kernels that correct the spatiotemporal-varying phase errors in the data. A dedicated calibration pipeline was designed to acquire high-quality source and target data for MLP training in both slice-by-slice and simultaneous multi-slice (SMS) acquisitions. To validate FCG's assumptions and performance, a field camera was used to provide ground-truth measurement of phase patterns. The performance of FCG was further validated on phantom and in vivo experiments using demanding EPI trajectories across multiple 3T and 7T systems. Results: Field camera measurements revealed strong spatiotemporal phase variations along the kx direction that repeat along ky during EPI readouts. The experiments on high-performance systems across 3T and 7T demonstrate that FCG can provide superior correction for the artifacts induced by spatiotemporal-varying phase errors compared with existing approaches. Conclusion: FCG is an effective and robust method for correcting spatiotemporal phase errors in EPI, enabling improved image quality on high-performance systems.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.