Back

Performance Evaluation of a Quantitative Metabolomics Workflow Incorporating Microchip Capillary Electrophoresis, Indexed Migration Time, and Single-Point External Calibration

Mellors, S.; Moss, C.; Redman, E. A.; Shuford, C.; Campbell, J. P.; Ramsey, J. M.; Coon, J.; Thompson, W.

2026-07-13 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.07.10.737294 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry (CE-MS) offers unique analytical advantages for polar metabolite profiling but has remained underutilized in metabolomics relative to liquid chromatography-MS (LC-MS), in part due to challenges in managing migration time drift during data analysis. Here we introduce the use of indexed migration time (iMT) for easily managing this aspect of CE-MS data for metabolomics. Migration time indexing using a panel of stable isotope-labeled (SIL) amino acid reference standards, stored as an iRT database in Skyline, outperformed both uncorrected migration time and relative migration time (RMT) correction across three independent analytical batches spanning 90 samples from four biological matrices. The indexed migration time approach achieved sub-1% relative standard deviation (RSD) in migration index across batches, compared to up to [~]15% RSD for uncorrected migration times. Additionally, we evaluate the use of single-point external calibration in Skyline for the purposes of metabolite quantification from complex matrices in order to ease the burden of translational metabolite quantification from metabolomics using high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS). Single-point external calibration using a biological matrix-based calibrator was benchmarked against a 13-point linear calibration curve across a panel of amino acids; above 1 M, greater than 95% of back-calculated concentrations fell within {+/-}20% of multi-point calibration. Application of the complete workflow to plasma, serum, urine, and NIST Standard Reference Material (SRM)-1950 demonstrated low inter-batch variability by principal components analysis, broad metabolite coverage across 126 quantifiable analytes, and strong quantitative concordance (Deming slope = 0.862, pseudo-R2 = 0.994, n = 64 analytes) with an independent comprehensive reference dataset for NIST SRM-1950. Together, these results establish a practical mCE-HRMS metabolomics workflow that bridges targeted and discovery metabolomics paradigms and lays the groundwork for single-point external calibration as a powerful tool for translational metabolomics.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
19.4%
2
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.6%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.1%
4
Metabolites
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.4%
5
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 29%
5.1%
6
Journal of Proteome Research
234 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.5%
7
Talanta
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
9
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.5%
11
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
Water Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
13
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.6%
14
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
130 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
15
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
16
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
17
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
19
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
20
Molecular Omics
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
21
Metabolomics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
22
BMC Methods
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
23
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
24
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
25
The Analyst
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
26
SLAS Discovery
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
27
PROTEOMICS
43 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%
28
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
29
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
30
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%