Back

Administrative Data-Based Staging of the Heart Failure Continuum in a Nationwide Population

Jarkovsky, J.; Parenica, J.; Benesova, K.; Linhart, A.; Kreji, J.; Malek, F.; Pudil, R.; Ostadal, P.; Blohlavek, J.; Chaloupka, A.; Palecek, T.; Kubanek, M.; Kautzner, J.; Hlasensky, J.; Dusek, L.; Melenovsky, V.; Wohlfahrt, P.

2026-07-17 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.07.10.26357788 medRxiv
Show abstract

Population-level data on preclinical heart failure (HF) remain limited because most epidemiological studies focus on symptomatic HF. We therefore developed an administrative-data algorithm to classify HF stages across the national population and describe temporal trends, stage transitions, and mortality across the HF continuum. Methods Using a claims-based staging framework adapted from the Universal Definition of HF, we classified HF stages from ICD-10 codes, prescription records, and medical procedures. We applied this algorithm to the Czech population, linking the National Registry of Reimbursed Health Services to National mortality records from 2015 to 2024. Results In 2024, 27.8% of the Czech population met criteria for Stage A HF and 8.2% for Stage B. Over 10 years, the prevalence of both preclinical stages increased beyond what could be explained by population aging alone, with age-standardized prevalence rising by 9.5% for Stage A and 19.2% for Stage B. Age-standardized 1-year mortality showed a steep stepwise gradient, from 0.69% in Stage A to 1.69% in Stage B, 3.06% in Stage C, and 7.27% in Stage D. Among 52,172 individuals with incident clinical HF in 2024, more than 95% had previously met administrative criteria for Stage A or Stage B. Conclusion Administrative surveillance of the HF continuum using routinely collected healthcare data provides a scalable administrative framework for population-level monitoring of HF burden. In Czechia, both preclinical and clinical HF burdens increased over time beyond population aging alone, underscoring the need for earlier preventive strategies targeting preclinical disease.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Heart Journal
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.9%
2
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
3
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.7%
4
Heart
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.8%
6
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.2%
8
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.2%
9
Open Heart
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
10
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
11
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
13
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Cardiovascular Research
37 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
16
The American Journal of Cardiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
17
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
19
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
20
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
European Respiratory Journal
59 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.6%