Back

Administrative Data-Based Staging of the Heart Failure Continuum in a Nationwide Population

Jarkovsky, J.; Parenica, J.; Benesova, K.; Linhart, A.; Kreji, J.; Malek, F.; Pudil, R.; Ostadal, P.; Blohlavek, J.; Chaloupka, A.; Palecek, T.; Kubanek, M.; Kautzner, J.; Hlasensky, J.; Dusek, L.; Melenovsky, V.; Wohlfahrt, P.

2026-07-17 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.07.10.26357788 medRxiv
Show abstract

Population-level data on preclinical heart failure (HF) remain limited because most epidemiological studies focus on symptomatic HF. We therefore developed an administrative-data algorithm to classify HF stages across the national population and describe temporal trends, stage transitions, and mortality across the HF continuum. Methods Using a claims-based staging framework adapted from the Universal Definition of HF, we classified HF stages from ICD-10 codes, prescription records, and medical procedures. We applied this algorithm to the Czech population, linking the National Registry of Reimbursed Health Services to National mortality records from 2015 to 2024. Results In 2024, 27.8% of the Czech population met criteria for Stage A HF and 8.2% for Stage B. Over 10 years, the prevalence of both preclinical stages increased beyond what could be explained by population aging alone, with age-standardized prevalence rising by 9.5% for Stage A and 19.2% for Stage B. Age-standardized 1-year mortality showed a steep stepwise gradient, from 0.69% in Stage A to 1.69% in Stage B, 3.06% in Stage C, and 7.27% in Stage D. Among 52,172 individuals with incident clinical HF in 2024, more than 95% had previously met administrative criteria for Stage A or Stage B. Conclusion Administrative surveillance of the HF continuum using routinely collected healthcare data provides a scalable administrative framework for population-level monitoring of HF burden. In Czechia, both preclinical and clinical HF burdens increased over time beyond population aging alone, underscoring the need for earlier preventive strategies targeting preclinical disease.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.