Back

Navigating Care in Crisis: A Qualitative Study of Healthcare Access Among Ethnically Diverse COVID-19 Patients in The Netherlands

Hensen, N.; Muru, G. N.; Prins, M.; Stronks, K.

2026-07-13 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.07.10.26357237 medRxiv
Show abstract

Ethnic minority and migrant populations experienced disproportionately severe COVID-19 outcomes across Europe, yet the mechanisms underlying these disparities, particularly inequities in healthcare access, remain insufficiently understood at the patient level. This qualitative study examines healthcare-seeking behaviours and access to care among ethnically diverse patients hospitalised with COVID-19 in Amsterdam between 2020 and 2022, and the contextual factors shaping their pathways to care. Twenty adults of Turkish, Moroccan, Surinamese, Ghanaian, and Dutch ethnic backgrounds, all hospitalised with COVID-19, were interviewed using a semi-structured retrospective approach to reconstruct individual care pathways from symptom onset to hospitalisation. Data were analysed thematically, guided by the Candidacy Framework and the Health Belief Model. Pandemic-induced structural disruptions, including healthcare system strain, capacity shortages, absent care protocols, and fragmented referral pathways, constituted the primary barriers to care across all ethnic groups. Participants with longer hospital stays tended to be older, less educated, and with more comorbidities, yet reported fewer barriers once hospitalised, as disease severity triggered prioritisation. Those with shorter stays or emergency department visits without admission encountered greater difficulties, including repeated discharge despite worsening symptoms. Language barriers and prior negative experiences with healthcare services compounded access challenges for some participants with migrant backgrounds, though pandemic phase and disease severity were the dominant determinants across the sample. Inequities in access to care were driven primarily by pandemic-induced structural factors rather than ethnic background. Pre-existing vulnerabilities among migrant groups, including reduced institutional trust and language barriers, intensified these structural barriers for some. These findings are directly relevant for equity-sensitive pandemic preparedness: crisis response frameworks must explicitly address structural accessibility alongside targeted support for groups facing compounding disadvantage.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 11%
16.9%
2
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 1%
15.0%
3
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.8%
4
Health Expectations
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMJ Public Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
Health Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
8
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
9
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
10
BJPsych Open
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
11
BMJ Open Quality
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
12
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
16
Global Health Action
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
17
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
18
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
British Journal of General Practice
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
22
Archives of Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.8%
24
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
25
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%