Back

Protocol for an EHR-embedded pragmatic randomized control trial of Ambient AI to Reduce Nursing Staff Documentation Time

Wieben, A.; Pfaff, J.; Ryan Baumann, M.; Resnik, F.; Brzozowski, S.; Langer, C.; Stine, K.; Gillis, C.; Gravel Sullivan, A.; Voegele, C.; Mrotek, L. A.; Afshar, M.; Burnside, E. S.; Hankwitz, J. L.; Rasmussen, S.; Jackson, R.; Kohler, B. L.

2026-07-13 nursing
10.64898/2026.07.09.26357653 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Documentation burden significantly impacts nursing workload and well-being, with nurses spending an estimated 20-40% of their time on documentation. Ambient AI technologies offer potential to reduce documentation time by mapping real-time nurse-patient conversations to structured EHR data entries with human-in-the-loop verification. Methods: This protocol describes a pragmatic, EHR-embedded randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of an Ambient AI tool in reducing nursing documentation time across three inpatient medical/surgical units. The study employs a closed-cohort, stepped-wedge, unit-randomized design, integrating the intervention into routine clinical workflows. The primary outcome is documentation time per shift hour, derived from EHR audit logs. Secondary outcomes include documentation burden, professional well-being, and perceived usability. Results: The trial is being implemented within a shared governance model that integrates executive oversight, operational feasibility, and research rigor. Multidisciplinary workgroups coordinate technical integration, user experience, and analytics, ensuring alignment between operational priorities and pragmatic trial objectives. Early implementation has highlighted the importance of adapting training and analytic strategies to address differential intervention exposure, as well as the need for rapid operational responses to late-emerging technical issues. Discussion: This protocol demonstrates the feasibility of embedding a randomized pragmatic trial within a health system-led operational deployment of Ambient AI for inpatient nursing documentation. The approach highlights the necessity of adapting existing outpatient provider-focused AI implementation strategies for inpatient nursing, emphasizing the unique nature of different nursing care environments. Recruitment challenges and the integration of research with operational workflows are discussed as key considerations for future pragmatic AI trials in nursing. Keywords: Artificial Intelligence; Ambient AI; Nursing Documentation; Documentation Burden; Large Language Models; Speech Recognition Software; Stepped-Wedge Design ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT07456241V4: 2026-05-27 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07456241

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JMIR Research Protocols
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.9%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.1%
3
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
10.4%
4
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.7%
5
JMIR Formative Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.4%
7
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.4%
8
DIGITAL HEALTH
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
9
Age and Ageing
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
10
JAMIA Open
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
11
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
12
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.6%
13
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
14
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
15
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
16
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
17
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
18
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
19
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Twin Research and Human Genetics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
21
Trials
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Behavior Research Methods
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
23
Systematic Reviews
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
24
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
25
Value in Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
26
International Journal of Medical Informatics
26 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%