Back

Development and Preliminary Clinical Feasibility of a Wearable Nanovibration Delivery Device for Localised Bone Stimulation in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury

Williams, J.; Gibson, R.; Campsie, P.; Dalby, M. J.; Riddell, J. S.; Purcell, M.; Coupaud, S.; Childs, P. G.; Reid, S.

2026-07-14 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.64898/2026.07.09.26357644 medRxiv
Show abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) causes rapid and severe bone loss in the paralysed lower limbs, particularly at the distal femur and proximal tibia, where fragility fracture risk is high. In vitro nanoscale vibration at 1 kHz has been shown to promote osteogenic differentiation and inhibit osteoclastogenesis, suggesting potential as a targeted mechanical intervention. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a wearable device for delivering and monitoring localised nanovibration at the distal femur in individuals with SCI. The device delivered continuous sinusoidal nanoscale stimulation at 1 kHz via a bone-conduction transducer, with an opposing accelerometer used to monitor transmitted vibration in real time. Design and target-site selection were refined through two healthy-volunteer investigations comparing the distal femur, proximal tibia, and distal tibia. Bovine femur experiments characterised vibration transmission under controlled benchtop conditions. Preliminary repeated-use feasibility was assessed in one individual with motor-complete SCI. Healthy volunteer testing showed that although the ankle initially produced the highest transmitted amplitudes, these were highly variable, and positioning was inconsistent. Within the knee region, the distal femur provided the most practical and repeatable site for a wearable application. In bovine femur experiments, scanning laser vibrometry demonstrated measurable vibration on the condylar surface opposite the transducer, and depth-resolved measurements confirmed that nanoscale vibration remained detectable within bone. A gel interface layer reduced the transmitted amplitude. In the feasibility evaluation, 61 sessions were completed over 14 weeks, with logged accelerometry confirming repeated nanoscale vibration transmission. These findings establish feasibility and support further device optimisation and translational studies.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 6%
8.1%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.9%
4
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.7%
5
JBMR Plus
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.7%
6
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
8
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
10
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
11
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
12
Trials
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
13
Journal of Applied Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
14
Translational Vision Science & Technology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
15
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.0%
16
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
17
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
Age and Ageing
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
19
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
20
Brain Stimulation
125 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
21
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
22
MethodsX
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
23
Acta Biomaterialia
92 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
24
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
25
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
26
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.0%
27
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
28
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
29
ACS Nano
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
30
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.9%