Back

FreqFuseNet: Resolving Feature-Scale Mismatch in Dual-Frequency Fusion for Thin-Wall Head-and-Neck OAR Segmentation

Chen, W.-Y.; Wan, S.-Y.; Lin, G.-Y.

2026-07-13 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.07.09.26357642 medRxiv
Show abstract

Accurate segmentation of thin-wall organs-at-risk (OARs)-the cochlea, vestibular semicircular canals, internal auditory canal, tympanic cavity, and middle ear-is clinically relevant for head-and-neck radiotherapy planning, yet these small, thin-wall structures remain among the most challenging targets for automated delineation. Dual-frequency feature fusion is a promising direction for boundary-sensitive representation, but under the investigated FP16 FFT-FcaNet setting, we observe an approximately 863-fold activation-scale mismatch between the FFT and FcaNet branches, causing a nominal 5 percent residual coefficient to behave as an approximately 43-fold dominant term. We propose FreqFuseNet, which resolves this mismatch by normalizing the FcaNet branch to the FFT activation scale before residual injection with a fixed low-amplitude coefficient (beta = 0.05), restoring beta as an interpretable 5 percent residual-amplitude coefficient relative to the FFT feature scale. Under a controlled binary per-OAR ROI protocol on the SegRap2023 head-and-neck CT benchmark across 10 clinically prioritized thin-wall OARs, FreqFuseNet achieves Dice of 0.849, HD95 of 0.824 mm, and SDice@1mm of 0.959 in the primary seed, with comparable performance in an independent second seed (Dice 0.843, HD95 0.823 mm). FreqFuseNet yields statistically significant case-level aggregate improvements over 3D U-Net and MedNeXt-S (Wilcoxon p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively), using only 29.7 million parameters versus 414.6 million for the full wavelet baseline.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
16.9%
2
Radiotherapy and Oncology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
3
Physics in Medicine & Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
4
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
5
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.3%
8
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
9
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.0%
10
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
12
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
14
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.1%
15
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
16
European Radiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
17
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
18
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
19
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%