Back

Automated Disease Activity Assessment in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Using Privacy-Preserving Large Language Models

Zhang, D.; Leung, R. L.; Wong, C.-K.; Chan, S. C. W.; Li, Y.; Tang, E. H. M.; Wu, T.; Chan, T. M.; Lau, C.-S.; Wong, C. K. H.; Leung, K. S. M.; Wong, Z. S.-Y.; Wu, J. T.-K.; Yap, D. Y.-H.

2026-07-10 health informatics
10.64898/2026.07.09.26357586 medRxiv
Show abstract

The Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) is a crucial but labor-intensive tool for managing SLE. We developed a privacy-preserving, model-agnostic large language model (LLM) framework to automate SLEDAI-2K assessment from real-world electronic health records. The framework was developed on a specialist-verified ground truth of 658 clinical notes and externally validated on 56 MIMIC-IV discharge summaries. Seven open-source LLMs were evaluated using advanced prompting and ensemble strategies. The top-performing model, a two-layered GPT-OSS-120B + verifier, achieved a micro-F1 of 94.2% for descriptor classification and an 86% exact match for SLEDAI-2K scores on the internal set, with corresponding external validation performance of 87.7% and 64%, respectively. To demonstrate clinical utility, the LLMs were deployed on 2,576 serial notes from 108 SLE patients. Patients identified by the LLMs as achieving sustained low disease activity had a significantly lower incidence of stage 3 chronic kidney disease (log-rank p = 0.0053), the need for kidney replacement therapy (p = 0.044), and hospitalization (p = 0.021) over 18.3 years of follow-up. These findings demonstrate that privacy-preserving LLMs, when guided by a well-designed framework, can assist in specialist-level reasoning in autoimmune diseases, offering a scalable solution for clinical decision support and patient management.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
27.1%
2
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.4%
3
JAMIA Open
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.4%
4
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 15%
5.6%
6
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.0%
7
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.3%
8
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.3%
9
JMIR Medical Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
10
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
47 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.2%
11
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
12
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
13
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
14
Med
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
15
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
16
Kidney International Reports
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
17
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.6%
18
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.6%
19
International Journal of Medical Informatics
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
20
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
21
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%