Back

miR319 promotes de novo shoot regeneration by repressing LsTCP4 in lettuce

Jiang, T.; Tanwir, S. E.; Karn, A.; Liu, F.; Huo, H.

2026-07-09 plant biology
10.64898/2026.07.08.737254 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Plant regeneration is a major determinant of transformation and genome-editing efficiency, yet the endogenous regulatory networks controlling regenerative competence in horticultural crops remain incompletely understood. The miR319-TCP module regulates multiple developmental processes in plants, but its function in lettuce regeneration has not been defined. Here, we performed a genome-wide analysis of the TEOSINTE BRANCHED1/CYCLOIDEA/PROLIFERATING CELL FACTOR (TCP) gene family in lettuce (Lactuca sativa). Thirty-three LsTCP genes were identified and classified into Class I/PCF, Class II/CIN, and Class II/CYC/TB1 groups. Five CIN-class genes, LsTCP2, LsTCP3, LsTCP4, LsTCP10, and LsTCP24, were predicted as high-confidence miR319 targets and supported by degradome-based cleavage evidence. MIR319-overexpression (OX319) explants showed enhanced de novo shoot regeneration, with 94.5% regeneration efficiency and 1.92 shoots per explant, whereas STTM-miR319 suppression (S319) explants showed reduced regeneration, with 28.5% regeneration efficiency and 0.36 shoots per explant. These phenotypes were associated with altered expression of several miR319-targeted CIN-TCP genes, particularly LsTCP4, LsTCP10, and LsTCP24. Disruption of LsTCP4 increased regeneration efficiency to 91.4% and shoot production to 2.05 shoots per explant, resembling the regeneration-enhancing effect of miR319 overexpression. In contrast, disruption of the non-target CIN gene LsTCP17 did not significantly affect regeneration under the tested conditions. Together, these results identify LsTCP4 as a key miR319-responsive negative regulator of de novo shoot regeneration and highlight miR319-mediated repression of LsTCP4 as a potential endogenous strategy for improving lettuce regeneration.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.4%
2
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 1%
9.4%
3
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
9.2%
4
Plant and Cell Physiology
52 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.5%
5
Plant Science
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.0%
6
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.9%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 28%
3.9%
9
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
10
Plant Biotechnology Journal
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
11
Plant Cell Reports
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
12
Horticulture Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.3%
13
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
14
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.8%
15
Planta
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
The Plant Genome
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.6%
17
The Plant Cell
161 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
18
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.4%
19
Plant Molecular Biology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
20
Nature Plants
94 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
21
Journal of Integrative Plant Biology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
22
Plant Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
23
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.1%
24
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.8%
26
Plants
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Environmental and Experimental Botany
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
28
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%