Back

The D2-mdx mouse as a preclinical model for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a natural history study across two independent sites

Mantuano, P.; Mele, A.; Boccanegra, B.; Tanganyika-de Winter, C.; Van De Vijver, D.; Schneider, A.-F.; Mele, M.; Cappellari, O.; Tulimiero, L.; Engelbeen, S.; Suidgeest, E.; van der Weerd, L.; Aartsma-Rus, A.; De Luca, A.; Gordish-Dressman, H.; van Putten, M.

2026-07-12 pharmacology and toxicology
10.64898/2026.07.08.737223 bioRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionThe quality of preclinical studies for rare diseases, such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), relies on the availability of comprehensive natural disease history data. In addition to the classic BL10-mdx mouse, in recent years, the D2-mdx model has increasingly been used as an alternative model due to its reportedly more severely impaired phenotype. To improve our understanding of disease progression in these two DMD models, we conducted a comprehensive natural history study. Materials and MethodsThis involved a cross-sectional analysis of key in vivo and ex vivo outcome measures performed in two independent laboratories, using the same study setup in compliance with TREAT-NMD Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), while also taking advantage of site-specific expertise. Globally, largely comparable results were obtained across the two study sites. ResultsBody composition showed pronounced differences between the strains, with BL10-mdx mice displaying a hypertrophic and D2-mdx mice displaying an atrophic phenotype. Dystrophic mice of each strain exhibited significant alterations of disease-relevant indices related to muscle functionality and integrity, mostly worsening with age, in comparison to their wildtypes. Cardiac function was affected earlier and more severely in D2-mdx mice. DiscussionNotably, for some parameters, genetic-background related differences were observed, emphasizing the need to include control groups with matching genetic backgrounds in experimental designs. ConclusionsCollectively, our natural history study provides benchmark data for these two mdx mouse strains to guide model selection for preclinical DMD studies, allowing accurate data interpretation. HighlightsO_LIDistinct body composition phenotypes: BL10-mdx mice exhibit pseudohypertrophy while D2-mdx mice display pronounced atrophy. C_LIO_LIEarlier cardiac dysfunction in D2-mdx: D2-mdx mice develop reduced ejection fraction and stroke volume from 28 weeks, while BL10-mdx only at 52 weeks. C_LIO_LIGenetic background-dependent variations: Intrinsic deficits in wildtype D2 mice demonstrate that genetic background influences outcome measures independent of dystrophic pathology. C_LIO_LIComparable ex vivo muscle physiology: Despite divergent in vivo phenotypes, isolated muscle contractile parameters show similar impairment in both dystrophic models. C_LIO_LIMulti-site standardized validation: Cross-sectional study at two independent laboratories following harmonized TREAT-NMD Standard Operating Procedures. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.7%
2
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 14%
5.7%
5
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
6
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Disease Models & Mechanisms
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
8
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.5%
9
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
10
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
11
Skeletal Muscle
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
12
British Journal of Pharmacology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
13
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
14
BMC Medical Genomics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
15
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
16
Neurobiology of Disease
148 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
17
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
18
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
19
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease
26 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
20
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
22
Human Molecular Genetics
141 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
23
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
24
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
25
Brain
168 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
26
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
27
Experimental Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
28
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
29
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
30
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%