Back

Hazard characterization of Alternaria toxins - filling data gaps on in vitro genotoxicity.

Behr, A.-C.; Vettorazzi, A.; Streel, C.; Mertens, B.; Antonissen, R.; Guerreiro, B.; Ventura, C.; Vilela, R. S.; Novak, M.; Zegura, B.; Reith, F.; Oltmanns, L.; Prisyazhnoy, V.; Suessmuth, R.; Silva, M.; Louro, H.; Marko, D.

2026-07-13 pharmacology and toxicology
10.64898/2026.07.08.737172 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Alternaria toxins are naturally occurring food contaminants with limited and often inconsistent genotoxicity and mutagenicity data. Within the European Partnership for the Assessment of Risks from Chemicals (PARC), an OECD-aligned in vitro testing strategy was applied to fill existing data gaps and to characterize the genotoxic potential of major Alternaria toxins using high-purity test materials. Mutagenicity was assessed using bacterial reverse mutation test (OECD TG 471) and SOS/umu assay, while chromosomal damage was assessed using the in vitro micronucleus (MN) assay (OECD TG 487) in TK6 and HepG2 cells, complemented by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and {gamma}H2AX assay in HepaRG cells. Alternariol (AOH), alternariol monomethyl ether (AME), and altertoxin-I (ATX-I) showed clear mutagenicity in bacteria, whereas altenuene (ALT), tenuazonic acid (TeA), and tentoxin (TEN) were negative under the tested conditions. In mammalian cells, AOH, AME, and ATX-I induced MN formation in TK6 cells at concentrations [≥]5.5 {micro}M, [≥]2.5 {micro}M, and [≥]0.21 {micro}M, respectively, with FISH analysis supporting a clastogenic mode of action. In HepG2 cells, all tested toxins induced chromosomal damage, with effect threshold ranging from [≥]6.25 {micro}M (AOH) to [≥]50 {micro}M (TeA). {gamma}H2AX induction confirmed DNA damage for AOH and ATX-I, and at higher concentrations for TeA (1000 {micro}M). Overall, the data indicate clear in vitro genotoxic potential for AOH, AME, and ATX-I and provide evidence of chromosomal damage for ALT, TEN, and TeA, thereby reducing critical data gaps for hazard assessment.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Archives of Toxicology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
Environment International
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
3
Chemosphere
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.8%
4
NeuroToxicology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.7%
6
Journal of Hazardous Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
Chemical Research in Toxicology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
8
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 30%
3.4%
10
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
11
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
12
Toxicological Sciences
41 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
13
Water Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
14
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
16
Pest Management Science
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
17
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
Environmental Research
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
21
Molecules
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%