Back

Cumulative Transfer Function for Assessment of MRI-Induced RF Heating Risk in Pediatric Patients Implanted with Bifurcated Leads

Jiang, F.; Vu, J.; Bhusal, B.; Qian, Y.; Hameed, S.; Kim, D.; Webster, G.; Bonmassar, G.; Golestani Rad, L.

2026-07-10 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.07.08.737115 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose: RF-induced heating remains a major barrier to MRI access for patients with epicardial cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Although ISO/TS 10974 Tier-3 transfer function (TF) methods are established for unbranched leads, no analogous framework exists for bifurcated leads, in which branch asymmetry and inter-branch coupling may substantially alter heating. We developed and validated a cumulative transfer function (cTF) framework to address this gap. Methods: Following ISO/TS 10974 Tier-3 formalism, we measured, calibrated, and validated cTFs for a commercial 35 cm bipolar epicardial lead at 1.5 T. The framework explicitly accounts for branch-specific response and cross-branch coupling. Validation was performed with 24 canonical lead configurations in a homogeneous phantom and, without recalibration, in a heterogeneous anthropomorphic pediatric phantom with clinically derived trajectories. A single-branch TF approximation served as a comparator. The validated cTF was applied to predict RF heating across adult and pediatric human models at multiple imaging landmarks. Results: Compared with the single-branch TF approximation, the cTF reduced prediction error by nearly 70% in the primary validation dataset. In secondary validation, the cTF maintained low error across clinically relevant trajectories and imaging landmarks. In human models, the framework revealed marked anatomy- and landmark-dependent variation in predicted heating for the tested 35 cm lead, with low predicted heating in pediatric models and substantially higher heating in selected adult chest and upper abdominal imaging scenarios. Conclusion: The cTF provides a validated framework for RF-heating assessment of bifurcated leads and substantially improves prediction accuracy over single-branch TF approximations that neglect branch coupling.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.2%
2
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.0%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.1%
4
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 14%
5.7%
6
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
7
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
9
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
10
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
11
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
13
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
14
Nature Biomedical Engineering
47 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
15
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
16
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.2%
19
Brain Stimulation
125 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
20
Photoacoustics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
21
Physics in Medicine & Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
22
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.1%
23
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
24
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
25
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
26
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
27
Biomaterials
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
28
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
29
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
30
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%