Associative Visual Memory in Aphantasia: Evidence for Intact Object and Spatial Memory, Metacognitive Awareness, but Different Strategies
Keogh, R.; Isherwood, Z.; Rich, A. N.
Show abstract
Many forms of memory are thought to rely on visual imagery, but individuals who report lacking visual imagery (aphantasia) can still perform various memory tasks. There is, however, evidence that aphantasia may lead to less detailed autobiographical memories, suggesting there may be deficits in the underlying cognitive processes that support personal memories. One such process is associative memory, which requires binding of different types of information. Here, we tested whether associative visual memory is intact in aphantasia. We assessed 72 self-identified individuals with aphantasia and 77 controls who reported having visual imagery. Participants completed an associative memory task which involved memorising displays where a unique object in a specific location was associated with a particular colour fixation point. Individuals with aphantasia performed equivalently to controls for object locations and outperformed controls on the associated object-identity. In addition, whereas controls were significantly worse at remembering associated object-identity than object-location, individuals with aphantasia showed no such difference. Both groups showed good metacognitive performance evidenced by a positive correlation between confidence and accuracy; there were no significant differences in confidence between the groups. Reported strategies varied between groups: a large proportion of control participants reported using visual imagery and self-reported use of imagery positively correlated with performance. Conversely, individuals with aphantasia mostly reported using nonvisual strategies to remember the associations. Overall, the findings suggest that individuals with aphantasia can form associative memories using nonvisual strategies. Thus, difficulties with autobiographical memory in aphantasia seem unlikely to be due to fundamental issues with associative memory.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.