Back

The Patients' Voice in Clostridioides difficile Infection: Large Language Model-Assisted Thematic Analysis of Patient Testimonials

Villafuerte-Galvez, J. A.; Noriega, M. A.; Cakir Colak, S.; Crawford, C. V.

2026-07-09 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.07.08.26357545 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background. Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) imposes a burden that extends well beyond the gastrointestinal tract, yet existing outcome measures only partially capture the patient experience. We used frontier large language models (LLMs) on patient and caregiver narratives at scale to describe how burden shifts with disease course. Methods. We analyzed 189 testimonials from the Peggy Lillis Foundation corpus, sorted into four cohorts with recurrence (r) and fulminant (f) severity as axes (rfCDI, fCDI, rCDI, non-rfCDI). Two independent LLMs coded eight thematic domains, four fulminant flags, thirteen emerging semantic fields, the dominant dimension, and narrative arcs. Two clinicians independently coded a subset for inter-rater reliability (PABAK, Gwet's AC1). Results. Treatment trajectory was the dominant theme in recurrent disease, whereas death and near-death dominated non-recurrent fulminant narratives. Psychological burden was near-universal in fulminant disease (98.0% in rfCDI, 97.2% in fCDI). Caregiver and bereavement content concentrated in fCDI (66.7%). Diagnostic failure was frequent across recurrent cohorts (47.6 - 56.1%). Bacteriotherapy tracked recurrence (60.2% rfCDI versus 5.6% fCDI). Financial, mental-health, and caregiver burdens were prominent and are currently unaddressed by guidelines. Human-human reliability was substantial (PABAK 0.79 for semantic fields, 0.76 for domains); arc coding was least reliable. Conclusions. Patient narratives reveal a course-dependent, multidimensional burden in CDI. Concrete gaps exist between what patients prioritize, what guidelines recommend, and what therapy access provides. Frontier-LLM coding, validated against clinicians, offers a reproducible route to translate these priorities into research, care, and policy.

Matching journals

The top 20 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.6%
2
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.2%
3
American Journal of Epidemiology
67 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
4
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.9%
6
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
73 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.9%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 19%
2.9%
8
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
9
Value in Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
10
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.0%
11
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.0%
12
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
13
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
15
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
16
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
17
Clinical Infectious Diseases
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
18
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
19
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
20
BMJ Public Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
50% of probability mass above
21
Systematic Reviews
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
22
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
142 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
23
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
24
American Journal of Infection Control
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
25
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
26
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
27
Emerging Infectious Diseases
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
28
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
29
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.0%
30
Epidemiology and Infection
89 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%