Engagement with a Chatbot-based Intervention for the delivery of mailed at-home COVID-19 Testing: a Descriptive Log Analysis Study from the SCALE-UP II Trial
Pierce, J. H.; Bian, J.; Kuzmenko, T. V.; Kaphingst, K. A.; Stevens, L.; Rush, A.; Benson, R.; Borsato, E. P.; Gibson, B.; Kawamoto, K.; King, A. J.; Orleans, B.; Chipman, J.; Greene, T.; Meads, R.; Siaperas, T.; Hughes, S.; Pruhs, A.; Dinkins, C. P.; Lam, C. Y.; Cornia, R. C.; Bradshaw, R. L.; Butler, J.; Schlechter, C. R.; Wetter, D. W.; Del Fiol, G.
Show abstract
Background Promoting at-home tests (e.g., for COVID-19) using chatbots may be a novel and scalable way to improve uptake across underserved populations. Objective The objective of this study was to assess the navigational patterns (i.e., sequence of interactions) of underserved populations when using a chatbot designed to provide education on COVID-19 testing and free order access for at-home COVID-19 test kits. Methods The study was a descriptive analysis of the original data of the chatbot intervention of the SCALE-UP II trial, which compared different digital health modalities (i.e., chatbots versus simple text messages) to deliver free at-home COVID-19 test kits to minority populations in Utah. SCALE-UP II (registration numbers NCT05533918; NCT05533359) was a multisite, pragmatic clinical trial with patients randomized in a 2x2x2 factorial design (smartphone study) to receive (1) chatbot or text messaging, (2) the option to request patient navigation, and (3) intervention frequency every 10 or 30 days. All other participants were randomized in a 2x2 factorial design (nonsmartphone study) to receive the option to request patient navigation and intervention frequency every 10 or 30 days. Eligible patients (1) had an appointment at one of the participating community health centers (CHC) in the last 3 years, (2) were 18 years and older, and (3) had a valid cellphone number recorded in the CHC electronic health record (EHR). The trial enrolled 2117 in the smartphone study and 31,439 in the nonsmartphone study. In the smartphone study, the proportion of participants who requested test kits in the Chatbot arm was lower than in SMS text messaging. In the nonsmartphone study, test kits was higher if they were messaged every 10 days. Sources of funding included the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) of the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant number 5U01MD017421 and by awards from the National Cancer Institute of the NIH (P30CA042014) and the Huntsman Cancer Foundation. Results: Of 1,051 patients randomized to the chatbot intervention, 309 (29%) launched the chatbot, 196 (63%) interacted with it, and 186 (60%) started the COVID-19 test kit ordering process. Among those who launched the chatbot, 170 (55%) completed a test kit order. One patient (0.3%) accessed the chatbot educational content. The median age was 51, with 66% female, 54% Latino/a, 55% uninsured, and 86% located in an urban area. Conclusion: Ordering of COVID-19 test kits among underserved patients who interacted with the chatbot was high. Thus, chatbots may represent a viable approach to reach underserved populations as a part of public health response in a pandemic. All patients except one placed orders without reviewing educational content. Chatbot design should identify and minimize the number of steps for patients to achieve a specific goal.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Using a Multilingual AI Care Agent to Reduce Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Higher FIT Test Adoption Among Spanish-Speaking Patients 96%
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based Chatbots in Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: A Systematic Review 95%
- Understanding how the design and implementation of Online Consultations influence primary care outcomes: Systematic review of evidence with recommendations for designers, providers, and researchers 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 95%
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 94%
- Impact of a pilot mHealth intervention on treatment outcomes of TB patients seeking care in the private sector using Propensity Scores Matching – Evidence collated from New Delhi, India 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Scientific hypothesis generation process in clinical research: a secondary data analytic tool versus experience study protocol 93%
- Strategies and Tools for electronic health records and physician workflow alignment: A scoping review protocol 93%
- Exposure to and engagement with digital psychoeducational content and community related to maternal mental health by perinatal persons and mothers: design of an online survey with optional follow-up and participant characteristics 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Is virtual care the new normal? Evidence supporting Covid-19’s durable transformation on healthcare delivery 95%
- Design and Formative Evaluation of a Voice-based Virtual Coach for Problem-Solving Treatment 93%
- Exploring Patient and Staff Experiences of Video Consultations During COVID-19 in an English Outpatient Care Setting: Secondary Data Analysis of Routinely Collected Feedback Data 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.