Back

Cutting Through the Noise: Stochastic Pulse Timing for Deep Brain Stimulation

Baker, M. R.; Bokil, H.; Niketeghad, S.; Miller, K. J.; Klassen, B. T.

2026-07-09 neurology
10.64898/2026.07.08.26357382 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a widely used therapy for neurologic and psychiatric disorders. Conventional DBS delivers highly regular stimulation patterns that suppress pathological activity but can induce stimulation-related side effects, limiting the therapeutic window. Introducing controlled temporal variability through stochastic pulse timing may represent an alternative programming dimension to improve tolerability while preserving clinical benefit. Methods: An adult in their 60's with bilateral Vim DBS underwent evaluation of tonic, pink-noise, and white-noise stimulation patterns delivered through his chronically implanted Boston Scientific Genus system using the Chronos research platform. We assessed tremor and stimulation-induced side effects using accelerometry, spiral drawing tasks, standardized speech recordings, and patient-reported paresthesias. Results: Pink noise stimulation preserved meaningful tremor suppression while improving tolerability compared with conventional tonic 130 Hz stimulation. Under tonic stimulation, dysarthria and paresthesias were prominent at 2.0 mA, narrowing the usable therapeutic window. In contrast, pink noise maintained tremor control across the same amplitude range with reduced side-effect burden. White noise stimulation demonstrated intermediate effects, providing improved tolerability relative to tonic stimulation but less tremor suppression than pink noise. Findings were consistent across accelerometry and functional drawing tasks. Conclusion: This study provides first-in-human evidence that temporally structured stochastic pulse timing can preserve therapeutic benefit while expanding the tolerable stimulation range relative to tonic DBS. These findings suggest that temporal structure represents a clinically meaningful programming dimension that may broaden the DBS therapeutic window using software based updates to existing hardware. Further evaluation in larger cohorts is warranted

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Brain Stimulation
125 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
31.0%
2
Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
3
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Clinical Neurophysiology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.5%
5
Neurosurgery
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
7
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
8
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
9
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
10
Annals of Neurology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
11
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
12
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
13
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.1%
14
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
15
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
16
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
17
Brain
168 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
18
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
19
Nature Biomedical Engineering
47 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
20
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
21
npj Parkinson's Disease
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%