Psychometric validation of the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 scoring tool across the first month postpartum: a cross-sectional psychometric study
Celetta, E.; Lorthe, E.; Cattani, G.; Epiney, M.; Grylka-Baeschlin, S.; Mueller, A. N.; Di Vincezo-Sormani, J.; Suppan, M.; Widmer, I. N.; Desplanches, T.; Gaucher, L.
Show abstract
Background: Postpartum recovery is a public health concern. The Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 (ObsQoR-10) is a brief patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess early recovery after childbirth. Its validation is currently limited to the first three days postpartum. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the ObsQoR-10 across the first 30 days postpartum. Methods:We conducted a cross-sectional psychometric evaluation of the ObsQoR-10 using baseline data from a national Swiss multilingual cohort (French, German, Italian, and English). Women were recruited within the first week postpartum and completed the ObsQoR-10 and the EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Levels (EQ-5D-5L) at a single time point within 30 days postpartum. Clinical data were extracted from medical records. Analyses were performed across three postpartum windows (0-2, 3-7, and 8-30 days). Structural validity, measurement invariance, reliability, and construct validity (convergent and known-groups) were assessed. Results:A total of 1935 women were included. Structural validity supported a stable four-factor structure with excellent model fit (CFI 0.995-0.997; RMSEA 0.055-0.059), and bifactor analysis supported essential unidimensionality. Measurement invariance was confirmed at metric and scalar levels across postpartum windows. Reliability was good (Cronbach's alpha 0.83-0.86). Convergent validity was supported by moderate correlations with the EQ-5D-5L (;0.51 to 0.30), decreasing over time. Known-groups validity was demonstrated by significantly lower scores in women with poorer health status, postpartum haemorrhage, and operative or caesarean birth (all p <0.001). Conclusions:The ObsQoR-10 demonstrates consistent, valid, and reliable psychometric properties for assessing postpartum recovery across the first 30 days.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A cross-national study of factors associated with women’s perinatal mental health and wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- Measurement of changes to the menstrual cycle: A transdisciplinary systematic review evaluating measure quality and utility for clinical trials 93%
- How do perceptions of Covid-19 risk impact pregnancy-related health decisions? A convergent parallel mixed-methods study protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Informal coercion during childbirth: risk factors and prevalence estimates from a nationwide survey among women in Switzerland 94%
- The prevalence of mental ill-health in women during pregnancy and after childbirth during the Covid-19 pandemic: a Systematic review and Meta-analysis 93%
- Maternal Postpartum Stress Scale: Translation and validation study of the Chinese version 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Caesarean birth in public maternities in Argentina: a formative research study on the views of obstetricians, midwives, and trainees 93%
- “When will this end? Will it end?” The impact of the March-June 2020 UK Covid-19 lockdown response on mental health: a longitudinal survey of mothers in the Born in Bradford study 92%
- The Basel Long COVID Cohort Study (BALCoS): protocol of a prospective cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Giving birth under hospital visitor restrictions: Heightened acute stress in childbirth in COVID-19 positive women 94%
- Synergistic effects of cardiovascular health and social isolation on adverse pregnancy outcomes 92%
- SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection in pregnant women: characterization of symptoms and syndromes predictive of disease and severity through real-time, remote participatory epidemiology 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.