Back

Cetacean Mammals of the Black and Azov Seas as Indicators of Habitat Quality via Stacked Species Distribution Models

Tytar, V.; Fedorenko, L.

2026-07-08 ecology
10.64898/2026.07.07.736995 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Habitat degradation and biodiversity loss in the Black and Azov Seas necessitate improved tools for spatially explicit conservation planning. We employed stacked species distribution modelling (SSDM) to assess habitat quality for the three resident cetacean species, the common dolphin (Delphinus delphis ponticus), the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus ponticus), and the harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena relicta), which serve as apex predators and indicators of ecosystem health. Occurrence data were compiled from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), and ensemble species distribution models (ESDMs) were constructed using nine algorithms within the SSDM framework, with eight environmental predictors extracted from Bio-ORACLE v3.0. Individual ESDMs demonstrated excellent predictive performance (AUC: from 0.82 to 0.83; TSS: from 0.65 to 0.67; prop.correct: from 0.82 to 0.83). However, the initial continuous stacking method (pSSDM) yielded low community-level prediction success (0.36), prompting evaluation of three correction approaches. The Probability Ranking Rule (PRR) substantially improved performance (prediction.success = 0.459, sensitivity = 0.704, Jaccard = 0.465), effectively mitigating the overprediction bias inherent in stacked models. Species richness mapping identified multi-species hotspots along the southwestern Black Sea shelf, the Crimean coast, the Kerch Strait, and parts of the eastern coast, while the deep central basin exhibited the lowest richness. Variable importance ranking revealed bathymetry as the primary community-level driver (41.2%), followed by dissolved oxygen (13.8%), sea surface temperature (11.9%), and salinity (10.4%). Species-specific importance patterns confirmed ecological niche segregation, with common dolphins favouring deeper offshore waters and bottlenose dolphins and harbour porpoises associated with shallower shelf environments. The moderate richness observed in the highly productive northwestern shelf, despite high nutrient inputs, may reflect a combination of natural factors (elevated turbidity, reduced salinity) and anthropogenic pressures (fisheries bycatch, shipping, coastal development, and military activity) that limit species co-occurrence. Our findings demonstrate that PRR-corrected SSDM provides a robust framework for mapping cetacean habitat quality and identifying conservation priorities in the Black and Azov Seas, offering an evidence-based tool to inform ecosystem-based management in this ecologically unique and increasingly pressured marine region.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ICES Journal of Marine Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.4%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 17%
11.6%
3
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.3%
4
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.7%
5
Frontiers in Marine Science
62 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.7%
6
Marine Ecology Progress Series
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 28%
3.9%
8
FACETS
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
9
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
10
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
11
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
12
Ecological Indicators
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
13
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
14
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
15
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
16
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Global Ecology and Biogeography
47 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
18
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
19
Journal of Fish Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
20
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
21
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
Environmental DNA
56 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
23
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
24
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
27
Limnology and Oceanography
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
28
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.6%
29
Conservation Letters
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
30
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.6%