Back

Structure-guided computational design and mechanistic understanding of the p95HER2-targeting NAZ-mAb antibody and its variants

Rawat, P.; Kyte, J. A.; Greiff, V.; Dorraji, E.

2026-07-11 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.07.07.736817 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is an oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinase in breast cancer and other malignancies. A subset of HER2-positive tumours expresses 611-CTF-p95HER2, a tumour-specific, hyperactive truncated isoform associated with metastasis and treatment resistance that lacks most of the extracellular domain targeted by conventional HER2-directed antibodies. We previously developed NAZ-mAb (formerly known as Oslo-2), a monoclonal antibody against 611-CTF-p95HER2. Here, we describe a computational antibody-engineering workflow for designing variants of NAZ-mAb. Starting from the sequence alone, we modeled the NAZ-mAb-611-CTF-p95HER2 complex, generated a combinatorial mutational landscape using FoldX 5.0, and prioritized candidate variants using predicted interaction energy and developability criteria. Two variants representing distinct design strategies were selected for validation: an aromatic double mutant, NAZ-mAb v1 (L:S31W/L:H107W), and a conservative single mutant, NAZ-mAb v2 (L:S31M). Both variants were successfully expressed as recombinant IgGs; NAZ-mAb v2 achieved a five-fold higher recombinant expression yield than parental NAZ-mAb, while both variants retained antigen binding with a higher apparent signal than the parental antibody in indirect ELISA. However, Biacore two-state kinetic analysis revealed weaker affinities than the parental antibody (KD NAZ-mAb v1: 32.6 nM, NAZ-mAb v2: 9.45 nM vs. parental NAZ-mAb: 5.33 nM). These findings show that the computational workflow can generate experimentally tractable, antigen-engaging NAZ-mAb variants, while also highlighting the limitations of fixed-backbone interaction-energy ranking as a predictor of binding affinity and yield. This study provides a practical framework for computationally driven, developability-aware antibody optimization in the absence of experimental structural data.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
mAbs
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.2%
2
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
7.8%
3
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
Antibody Therapeutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.5%
6
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
7
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
77 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.4%
9
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
10
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.1%
11
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
12
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Cell Chemical Biology
94 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
14
Journal of Molecular Biology
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
Protein Engineering, Design and Selection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
16
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
17
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.0%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.0%
19
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
22
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
24
ChemBioChem
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%