Back

Optimizing Signal Acquisition and Chemometric Pipelines for Micro NIR Plant Identification: Evaluating Spectral Backgrounds and Data Processing in Herbarium Specimens

Alves, T. C.; de Gasper, A. L.

2026-07-07 ecology
10.64898/2026.07.07.736730 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Premise: Rapid and accurate plant species identification is a critical challenge exacerbated by the taxonomic impediment. Although portable near-infrared (Micro NIR) spectroscopy represents a promising solution, the current absence of standardized protocols and a fundamental understanding of how critical acquisition and analysis parameters influence accuracy remain significant barriers. This study focused on the systematic optimization and validation of a comprehensive workflow designed to maximize the reliability of plant identification using this technology. To ensure methodological robustness across diverse foliar matrices, four vascular plant species were strategically selected as a representative test set to encompass morphological extremes, including significant variations in leaf thickness, pubescence, and surface texture. Methods: Using a portable spectrometer on herbarium specimens (exsiccate) of four vascular plant species, we systematically tested five spectral backgrounds, seven pre-processing methods, and four classification models. Subsequently, we optimized the number of spectral readings and evaluated the influence of the leaf scanning surface (adaxial vs. abaxial) on model accuracy. Results: The highest-performing combination was a Shiny Aluminum background, Second Derivative pre-processing, and a Random Forest model, which achieved a mean cross-validated accuracy of 99%. An average of just three spectral readings from the adaxial (upper) leaf face was sufficient to saturate model performance, proving statistically superior to other approaches (p < 0.001). Discussion: This study establishes a validated, high-accuracy protocol for plant species identification from herbarium specimens using portable NIR, offering a powerful tool for biodiversity studies. Direct applicability to fresh plants in the field requires future validation to account for the spectral influence of moisture variability.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 4%
31.5%
2
Plant Methods
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 7%
8.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.4%
5
Plants
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
6
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
7
Remote Sensing
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
8
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.2%
9
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.2%
10
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.2%
11
Ecological Indicators
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
13
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
14
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
15
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
16
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
18
Plant Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
19
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
20
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
21
Sustainability
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
22
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%