Back

Wearable tissue oximetry during standardized physiological stressors in chronic heart failure outpatients

Roumengous, T.; Chauntry, A.; Flippen, C.; Wallner, J.; Baran, D. A.; Harkins, D.

2026-07-13 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.07.07.26357512 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Outpatient chronic heart failure (HF) assessment relies on NYHA class and distance-based testing that can obscure physiological heterogeneity. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) enables tissue oxygenation phenotyping but is underexplored during standardized stressors in outpatient HF. We tested whether wearable NIRS-derived oxygenation kinetics during a vascular occlusion test (VOT) and six-minute walk test (6MWT) differ across NYHA classes. Methods: In this prospective, single-center pilot study, 44 chronic HF outpatients (mean age 70.9 {+/-} 8.7 years, 75% male; NYHA I [n=19], II [n=12], III [n=13]) were monitored with a novel wearable NIRS device (NIRSense Envello Core) during a VOT and 6MWT. Primary endpoints were the post-occlusion net area under the curve (net AUC; VOT) and post-walk recovery net AUC (modified 6MWT). Secondary endpoints included the exertional tissue oxygenation (Oxy) nadir, VOT reperfusion kinetics, gait metrics, and tolerability. Results: Despite NYHA I and II walking identical median distances (420 m), post-walk recovery net AUC was lower in NYHA II (-16.3 a.u.xs) and III (-12.8 a.u.xs) than NYHA I (46.1 a.u.xs, p=0.004). The exertional Oxy nadir did not differ (p=0.722), but NYHA III walked 27% and 38% slower than NYHA II and I (p<0.001). NYHA II had higher VOT net AUC (134.2 a.u.xs) than NYHA I (71.9; p=0.018) and III (61.1; p=0.011). Post-walk recovery net AUC correlated with gait velocity (rs=0.44) and distance (rs=0.39; both p<0.05). VOT net AUC did not correlate with functional metrics, but resting reperfusion kinetics correlated with 6MWT performance (rs=0.41-0.46, p<0.05). The sensor was well tolerated. Conclusions: Wearable NIRS-derived recovery kinetics differentiated NYHA I from NYHA II despite these classes walking identical median distances. Coupled with distinct resting VOT hyperemic differences, these preliminary findings indicate wearable NIRS may capture physiological heterogeneity in outpatient HF not reflected by NYHA class and standard functional metrics.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.6%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 6%
8.1%
3
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.9%
4
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
5
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
6
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.3%
7
Heart
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
8
Physiological Measurement
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
9
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
10
The American Journal of Cardiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.2%
50% of probability mass above
11
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
12
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Heart Rhythm
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
17
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
18
European Heart Journal
22 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
19
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
20
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
22
DIGITAL HEALTH
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
23
JMIR Formative Research
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
24
Open Heart
21 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
25
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
26
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
Critical Care Explorations
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
28
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
29
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
30
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%