Awareness and perceptions of social prescribing among university students in the UK
Bone, J. K.; Fancourt, D. K.; Hayes, D.
Show abstract
Universities provide a key opportunity to deliver social prescribing, a care pathway that aims to connect people with non-medical forms of support within the community to address their social, emotional, and practical needs. However, it is unclear whether students in the UK are aware of social prescribing and whether it would be an acceptable form of support. We surveyed 775 university students across the UK who completed a questionnaire measuring awareness and perceptions of social prescribing. We described awareness and attitudes and used logistic regression to explore how they differed according to individual characteristics. We found an awareness-attitude paradox. Only 25% of students were aware of social prescribing, but attitudes were overwhelmingly positive once explained: 97% thought it could support mental health and wellbeing; 95% believed universities should offer it; and 89% would accept social prescribing if offered by a healthcare professional. Students who were older, postgraduates, and had English as their first language were among those with higher odds of being aware of social prescribing, but positive attitudes were more evenly reported across the sample. Our findings indicate that implementation efforts should prioritise awareness-raising and clear referral pathways, rather than increasing students' willingness to engage with social prescribing.
Matching journals
The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The United Kingdom Research study into Ethnicity And COVID-19 outcomes in Healthcare workers (UK-REACH): Protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study of healthcare and ancillary workers in UK healthcare settings 93%
- While they wait: A cross-sectional survey on wait times for mental health treatment for anxiety and depression for Australian adolescents 93%
- “When will this end? Will it end?” The impact of the March-June 2020 UK Covid-19 lockdown response on mental health: a longitudinal survey of mothers in the Born in Bradford study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The health impacts of a 4-month long community-wide COVID-19 lockdown: Findings from a prospective longitudinal study in the state of Victoria, Australia 94%
- Loneliness among people with severe mental ill health during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from a linked UK population cohort study 93%
- Characteristics of mental health stability during COVID-19: An online survey with people residing in the Liverpool City Region 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Does pre-infection stress increase the risk of long COVID? Longitudinal associations between adversity worries and experiences in the month prior to COVID-19 infection and the development of long COVID and specific long COVID symptoms 93%
- Experience of clinical services shapes attitudes to mental health data sharing: Findings from a UK-wide survey 93%
- Associations of socioeconomic position and adverse childhood experiences with health-related behaviour changes and changes to employment during the first COVID-19 lockdown in the UK 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 92%
- Challenges of visibility and inclusion in Long COVID: a population-based interview study 92%
- Development and psychometric testing of EPAT-16: A short and valid measure for patient-centeredness from the patient’s perspective 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mental health in higher-education students and non-students: evidence from a nationally representative panel study 93%
- Mental Health of Clinical Staff Working in High-Risk Epidemic and Pandemic Health Emergencies: A Rapid Review of the Evidence and Meta-Analysis 93%
- Impact on mental health care and on mental health service users of the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods survey of UK mental health care staff 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.