Back

Empirical contact networks reveal heterogeneous outbreak risks in a UK long-term care facility: a modelling study

Pi, L.; Davis, E. L.; Danon, L.; Hollingsworth, D.

2026-07-10 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.07.07.26357238 medRxiv
Show abstract

Long-term care facilities (LTCs) worldwide experienced disproportionately high infection and mortality rates during the COVID-19 pandemic, where essential care limits opportunities for contact segregation. However, empirical contact data remain scarce, limiting our understanding of how individual contact behaviours shape transmission in these settings. In this study, we developed a stochastic network-based transmission model parameterised using real-world self-reported contact data collected from a median-sized UK LTC unit. By incorporating high-resolution observational data that reflect routine care delivery patterns, we quantified how heterogeneity in contact networks influences outbreak dynamics. We found substantial variation in contact behaviour between individuals, resulting in highly heterogeneous transmission outcomes. Outbreak occurrence, timing, final size, and the likelihood of super-spreading events all varied markedly depending on the structure of the underlying contact network and the characteristics of the index case. Individuals with high contact activity were considerably more likely to initiate large outbreaks than those with fewer contacts. For a per-contact transmission probability of 10%, introduction of infection through the most highly connected individuals resulted in a greater than 75% probability of a large outbreak. Our findings indicate that preventing infection introduction through both residents and staff is critical for outbreak control in LTCs. Individuals with high contact activity were consistently associated with a greater probability of initiating large outbreaks, highlighting the importance of accounting for contact heterogeneity when designing surveillance and infection-control measures. More broadly, this study demonstrates the importance of accounting for contact-network heterogeneity when designing infection prevention and control measures in LTC settings, and highlights the value of integrating empirical contact data with transmission modelling to inform evidence-based outbreak preparedness, targeted surveillance, and infection-control strategies in long-term care facilities.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
45.6%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
3
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.5%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.4%
5
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.6%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.4%
8
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
9
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
73 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
10
Epidemiology and Infection
89 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
12
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
13
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
14
BMJ Public Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
15
Age and Ageing
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
16
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
18
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
19
Emerging Infectious Diseases
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
Journal of Hospital Infection
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
23
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%