Back

Origin of Fe ions in ROS production induced in magnetic hyperthermia anti-cancer nanotherapy: release from iron oxide nanoparticles or not?

Journaux-Duclos, J.; Bejko, M.; Clerc, P.; Al Yaman, Y.; Abdelhamid, A. G. A.; Ballon, G.; Bousquet, C.; Carrey, J.; Mornet, S.; Sandre, O.; Gigoux, V.

2026-07-08 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.07.06.736751 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The first and critical reaction in magnetic hyperthermia to induce the death of cancer cells is the production of ROS (reactive oxygen species). We previously showed that it is possible to specifically deliver iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles (IONPs) in the lysosomes of cancer cells and eradicate them by targeted magnetic intra-lysosomal hyperthermia (MILH) via the application of a high frequency alternating magnetic field (AMF) without macroscopic temperature elevation. The mechanism involves a local temperature elevation at the IONPs surface which enhances the ROS production through the Fenton reaction; ROS then peroxide the proteins and lipids of the lysosomal membrane, inducing its permeabilization and leading to lysosomal enzymes release and cell death. Fe ions, critical to produce ROS in MILH, were assumed to be released by IONPs. We thus developed PEGylated multi-cores IONPs called NanoFlowers (NF@PEG) presenting or not a SiO2 shell (NF@SiO2@PEG), the later preventing the Fe3+ release from IONPs. NF@PEG released Fe ions and produced ROS production in vitro, in acidic medium mimicking lysosome upon AMF exposure, whereas NF@SiO2@PEG did not. Surprisingly, both nanoparticles increased the ROS production in cells, induced lysosome permeabilization and cell death, and slowed down the proliferation of cancer cells with the same efficacy, upon AMF application, indicating that MILH was efficient in absence of Fe3+ release from IONPs. In contrast, Ferristatin-II, an iron uptake inhibitor, prevented the ROS production and cell death in MILH induced by both IONPs, elucidating the role of endogenous iron cations responsible for the ROS production ROS in MILH to kill cancer cells.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ACS Nano
113 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
2
Nanoscale
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
3
Journal of Controlled Release
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
4
Journal of Nanobiotechnology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 19%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.5%
7
Advanced Functional Materials
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
8
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.8%
9
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.2%
10
ChemBioChem
55 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
11
Advanced Healthcare Materials
85 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
12
Small
78 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
13
Nanoscale Advances
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
14
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
15
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
16
Materials Today Bio
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
17
Nano Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Biomaterials
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
19
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
21
Theranostics
37 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
22
Nature Materials
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
23
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%