Back

BBBP_Atlas: Unified Interpretable Modeling of Blood Brain Barrier Permeability across Small Molecules and Peptides

Shen, X.; Su, Q.; Luo, H.; Gou, Q.; Ge, J.; Hou, T.; Wang, J.; Kang, Y.

2026-07-09 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.07.06.736742 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Accurate prediction of blood-brain barrier permeability (BBBP) is essential for central nervous system drug discovery, yet existing models are often limited by their reliance on predefined physicochemical descriptors, small-molecule-centered training sets, or conformation-dependent representations, which restricts their transferability across chemically diverse modalities especially peptides. In addition, publicly available BBBP datasets remain fragmented, inconsistently standardized, and weakly controlled for molecular redundancy, increasing the risk of data leakage and overestimated model performance. In this study, we propose BBBP-Atlas, a structure-aware BBB permeability prediction model designed for unified modeling of small molecules and peptides with the first cross-modal dataset OmniBBBP. Designed to bypass descriptor and conformation dependencies, our model represents standardized molecular structures as atom-level graphs to capture local atom-bond environments and long-range topological dependencies associated with BBB transport. This design enables direct learning of structure-permeability relationships from molecular topology. For model training and evaluation, we curated a cross-modal, redundancy-filtered database OmniBBBP that seamlessly unifies small molecules and complex peptides, containing 10,218 unique compounds with 9,316 small molecules and 902 peptides. BBBP-Atlas achieved an accuracy of 0.8914 and an MCC of 0.7678 on the independent test set. On a balanced external benchmark of 200 compounds, our model reached an AUC of 0.9108, an accuracy of 0.8500, and an MCC of 0.7000, outperforming LightBBB by an absolute MCC gain of 6%. Case studies further showed that BBBP-Atlas captured clinically meaningful BBB permeability patterns, correctly identifying lorlatinib as BBB-permeable and vancomycin as BBB-impermeable with high confidence. The OmniBBBP-backed BBBP-Atlas offers a versatile and cross-modal approach for single-compound prediction, batch screening, and dataset exploration for CNS drug discovery. BBBP-Atlas is available at https://cadd.drugflow.com/bbbp/.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.1%
2
Journal of Cheminformatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.1%
3
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 3%
8.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.7%
5
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.3%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.2%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.2%
8
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
9
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
10
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
11
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
12
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.5%
13
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.2%
15
mAbs
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
16
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.1%
17
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
19
npj Antimicrobials and Resistance
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
20
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
21
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
22
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.6%
23
Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
24
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
Chemical Science
73 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%