Back

Adult current and former nicotine users' and adolescents' views on vape-free places: findings from UK cross-sectional surveys

Ford, A.; Best, C. S.; Moodie, C.; Alexandrou, G.; MacKintosh, A. M.

2026-07-09 public and global health
10.64898/2026.07.06.26357368 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction The Tobacco and Vapes Act 2026 provides the UK government powers to ban vaping in public places. Proposals include extending existing indoor smoke-free legislation to also being vape-free and making public children's playgrounds and outdoor areas of education settings vape-free. We examined adults' and adolescents' views on vape-free places. Methods Two UK-wide cross-sectional online surveys were conducted in 2026, one with adult (18+) current and former nicotine users (n=2,851), and one with adolescents aged 11-17 years (n=2,123). We measured (1) perceived acceptability of vaping in public places, (2) views on whether vapes should/should not be allowed in public places, and (3) perceived likelihood of public compliance with vaping bans. Results Adults considered it unacceptable to vape on public transport (85.9%), on school grounds (outdoors) (83.6%), outside hospital entrances (59.2%), and inside pubs (57.8%) and nightclubs (52.5%). A minority considered it unacceptable to vape at open air playparks (40.6%). Most adolescents viewed vaping as unacceptable in all locations. Perceived acceptability of vaping in each place was associated with current vaping and/or smoking. Adults and adolescents believed vaping should not be allowed on public transport (88.9%; 93.8%) or outdoors on school grounds (85.8%; 93.5%). Adults and adolescents perceived likely compliance on public transport, school grounds and in pubs, but not in nightclubs, outside hospital entrances and at open air playparks. Conclusion The findings indicate public support for some vape-free places among adults and adolescents, particularly on public transport and school grounds, and less so for a ban at open air playparks.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nicotine and Tobacco Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.9%
2
Addiction
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
3
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.9%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.7%
5
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.5%
7
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.8%
8
Thorax
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
9
ERJ Open Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
10
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
41 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
11
Preventive Medicine Reports
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
International Journal of Drug Policy
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
BMJ Public Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
14
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
18
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
20
Journal of Public Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
21
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%