Back

Explainable machine learning for the prediction of motor fluctuations and Levodopa-induced dyskinesias in Parkinson's disease

Endrizzi, W.; Campese, N.; Ragni, F.; Moroni, M.; Bovo, S.; Longo, C.; Gios, L.; Uccelli, A.; Giometto, B.; Jurman, G.; Osmani, V.; Malaguti, M. C.; NeuroArtP3 Network,

2026-07-09 neurology
10.64898/2026.07.06.26357357 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Motor complications, such as motor fluctuations and Levodopa-induced dyskinesias (LID), significantly impair quality of life in persons with Parkinson's disease (PD) on long-term Levodopa treatment. Predicting their onset is crucial for tailored patient care. Objectives: To develop and evaluate machine learning (ML) models to forecast the onset of new motor fluctuations and LID in PD patients within three years from baseline assessment, and to assess how training cohort composition influences performance. Methods: A comprehensive ML workflow with repeated Nested Grid Search Cross-Validation was applied to real-world clinical data from a multicentric cohort of 247 PD patients. ML models were rigorously evaluated on the clinically relevant subgroup free of motor complications at baseline. SHAP analysis provided model explainability. Results: Models achieved moderate predictive power for both LID (SVC: MCC 0.28 {+/-} 0.14) and motor fluctuations (Voting MCC = 0.32 {+/-} 0.18). For LID prediction, the strongest predictors were the Levodopa Equivalent Daily Dose (LEDD), baseline motor fluctuations, and duration of Levodopa therapy, with risk increasing significantly above a LEDD threshold of 300-400 mg. A critical ablation study revealed that excluding patients with pre-existing complications caused a collapse in model sensitivity, highlighting their essential role in defining the upper bound of predicted risk. Conclusions: The model-based risk assessment is consistent with established clinical factors. Inclusion of the full spectrum of disease severity, including patients with pre-existing motor complications, in the training set is essential for achieving a robust probabilistic risk scale and reliable model calibration for new-onset prediction.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Parkinson's Disease
105 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
19.1%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.1%
3
Journal of Parkinson’s Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.5%
5
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.7%
6
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
8
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
9
Movement Disorders
71 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
10
Journal of Parkinson's Disease
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
11
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
12
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
13
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
14
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Brain
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.5%
17
Annals of Neurology
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
18
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
19
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
20
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
24
Journal of Neurology
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%