Back

Tune Out: A randomised controlled trial to investigate the impact of an online program on tinnitus severity, handicap, and psychological symptoms in adults with tinnitus.

Laird, E. C.; Gosbell, D.; Dall'Est, A.; Malicka, A.

2026-07-08 otolaryngology
10.64898/2026.07.05.26357341 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy, engagement, and usability of Tune Out, an unguided, self-paced online tinnitus management program, for reducing tinnitus severity in adults with tinnitus. Design: A two-arm, parallel-group randomised controlled trial was conducted with Australian adults reporting diagnosed or self-reported tinnitus. Participants were randomised to immediate access to Tune Out or a waitlist control group. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks. The primary outcome was tinnitus severity measured using the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI). Secondary outcomes included tinnitus handicap, psychological symptoms, program engagement, self-efficacy, and usability. Results: Eighty-eight participants were randomised: 43 to the intervention group and 45 to the waitlist control group. The primary outcome analysis included 63 participants at 12 weeks. A significant Group x Time interaction was observed for TFI total score, indicating greater reductions in tinnitus severity over time in the intervention group compared with waitlist control, F(2, 102.57) = 5.95, p = .004, partial 2= .104. Significant effects were also observed for tinnitus handicap, F(2, 106.76) = 4.12, p = .019, partial 2 = .072. Effects on psychological symptoms were less consistent, although anxiety showed a significant Group x Time interaction, F(2, 116.85) = 3.63, p = .030, partial 2 = .059. At 12 weeks, 23.1% of intervention participants achieved a clinically meaningful reduction in tinnitus severity compared with 5.4% of controls. Program use was highly variable, with a median use of 1.10 hours, and 25.6% of intervention participants recording no use. Usability ratings were favourable among respondents, with a mean System Usability Scale score of 73.13. Conclusions: Tune Out demonstrated preliminary efficacy for reducing tinnitus severity and tinnitus handicap compared with waitlist control. Effects on broader psychological symptoms were less consistent. Although usability was rated positively, low and variable engagement highlights the need for strategies to support uptake and sustained use in unguided digital tinnitus interventions.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 14%
13.1%
2
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
12.3%
3
JMIRx Med
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
JMIR Formative Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
5
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.7%
6
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Trends in Hearing
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
8
Brain Research Bulletin
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
9
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
10
ERJ Open Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.9%
12
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.7%
13
Ear & Hearing
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
14
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
15
Hearing Research
54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
16
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Applied Sciences
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
18
DIGITAL HEALTH
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
19
Aperture Neuro
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
20
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
21
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.0%
22
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Sleep Medicine
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
24
Behavior Research Methods
30 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
25
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
26
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%