Back

Biodiversity knowledge and conservation shortfalls in Rivulidae fishes

Costa, J. H. A. d.; Guedes, G. H. S.

2026-07-06 ecology
10.64898/2026.07.04.736495 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The biodiversity crisis is exacerbated by persistent gaps in taxonomic, geographic, and conservation knowledge. This study provides a comprehensive assessment of Linnean, Wallacean, and conservation shortfalls in Rivulidae (Cyprinodontiformes), one of the most diverse families of Neotropical freshwater fishes. To this end, an extensive dataset was compiled, comprising 494 valid species, 51 synonyms, 3,419 occurrence records, and information on life cycle, distribution, and conservation status. The Linnean shortfall remains open: after 1975, the rate of species description increased sharply, and estimates indicate that 103 species remain undescribed (95% CI: 53-212). The year of species description was influenced by detectability and accessibility factors, with larger species, more widely distributed species, and species occurring in more densely populated areas being described earlier. The Wallacean shortfall was broad and spatially uneven: only 5.34% of the region was considered adequately sampled. The conservation shortfall was also substantial: 179 species are threatened with extinction, 69 species remain Not Evaluated, and 62 are Data Deficient. The mean time between taxonomic description and first IUCN extinction-risk assessment was 25.7 years. Moreover, 59.9% of species have no records within protected areas, including 69.3% of threatened species. These findings synthesize an urgent challenge: biodiversity knowledge and conservation shortfalls must be overcome simultaneously to protect species that are still being discovered, remain poorly documented spatially, and are restricted to habitats under intense anthropogenic pressure. The conservation of Rivulidae cannot wait for complete knowledge; action amid uncertainty is necessary to prevent both known and unknown species from disappearing.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.6%
2
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
3
Conservation Letters
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
Biodiversity and Conservation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 18%
5.2%
6
Animal Conservation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
8
Conservation Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
9
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
10
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
11
Conservation Science and Practice
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
13
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Diversity and Distributions
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
15
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
16
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
17
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
18
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.1%
19
FACETS
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
21
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
23
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.0%
24
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Ecological Indicators
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
27
Global Ecology and Biogeography
47 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
28
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
29
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
30
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%