Residual Hair Biomaterial Particulates Improve Dermal Regeneration and Combined with Electrical Stimulation Accelerates Skin Wound Closure

Objective: To evaluate the effect of residual hair (RH) biomaterial particulates, biphasic electrical stimulation (ES), and their combination (RHES) on the kinetics and quality of skin wound healing. Method: Eighteen adult albino mice received bilateral, splinted 10-mm full-thickness dorsal excisional wounds and were randomly assigned to one of three animal groups producing four wound-level treatment conditions: untreated control (-) (n = 12), RH (n = 12), ES (n = 6), and combined RHES (n = 6 wounds). Daily wound images were segmented using an AI-assisted workflow: a U-Net (ResNet34 encoder, ImageNet-pretrained, trained on a parallel single-expert tracing study with held-out validation Dice = 0.906) generated initial boundary predictions, each reviewed and corrected as needed. Wound size measures (perimeter, area, equivalent diameter [D_eq], circularity, aspect ratio) were normalized to the day-0 value of each wound and analyzed by linear mixed-effects regression with mouse identity as a random intercept and mouse body weight as a covariate. On day 7, wounds were excised, fixed, processed for histology, and analyzed by Masson's trichrome (collagen content in granulation tissue) and GAP-43 immunohistochemistry (a marker of regenerative cellular activity). Results: All three treatments significantly accelerated wound closure compared to (-) (Day x Treatment interaction {chi}2(3) = 36.4, ***p < 0.0001). The closure-rate advantages on the log-D_eq scale were ES -0.047/day (***p < 0.0001), RHES -0.029/day (***p = 0.0005), and RH -0.022/day (**p = 0.0015). By day 7, mean D_eq had decreased to 0.58 of the day-0 value in ES, 0.69 in RHES, 0.73 in RH, and 0.79 in (-). Tissue analyses revealed treatment-specific differences in healing quality: RH and RHES wounds contained 6.1x and 8.5x more collagen in granulation tissue than (-) (both **p = 0.002 vs (-); both **p = 0.009 vs ES), and showed approximately 16x and 27x greater mean GAP-43 expression than (-), respectively; the RHES increase remained significant after Bonferroni correction (adjusted *p = 0.042), whereas the RH increase did not (adjusted p = 0.058). ES alone did not significantly increase either collagen content or GAP-43 expression. Wound shape was more circular and more stable across days in RH-containing groups. Mouse body weight did not predict closure, whereas image-derived dryness, eschar coverage, and wound contraction were significant negative predictors of measured wound size. Conclusion: ES, RH, and RHES each significantly improve wound closure kinetics. The improvement appears mechanistically distinct: ES principally accelerates closure rate, while RH principally enhances tissue-level regenerative markers (collagen deposition and GAP-43 expression). RHES combines both advantages.