Back

Benchmarking AlphaFold and related deep learning approaches for modeling antibody and TCR antigen recognition

Yin, R.; Saravanakumar, S.; Shi, S. Y.; Park, M.; Lin, V.; Lee, J.; Cheung, M.; Felbinger, N.; Kaufman, S.; Eisenberg, M.; Pierce, B.

2026-07-06 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.07.04.736425 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Determining the structural basis of antigen recognition by antibodies and T cell receptors (TCRs) provides critical insights into effective immune targeting and can inform design of biotherapeutics and vaccines. Accurate computational modeling of antibodies and TCRs in complex with their targets poses a major challenge for predictive methods, including AlphaFold, which is generally accurate for modeling protein complexes but has shown limited success for immune recognition. In this study we assessed the performance of AlphaFold2, AlphaFold3, increased sampling protocols, and related deep learning methods for modeling antibody-protein, antibody-peptide, and TCR-peptide-major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) recognition. We show that increased sampling and AlphaFold3 generally improve performance relative to default sampling and AlphaFold2, however predictive accuracy and improvement levels varied considerably among interface classes, with antibody-peptide complexes representing a challenge despite their small antigen size. Comparing per-case success across methods showed some complementarity, indicating opportunities for increased success through model pooling approaches, for instance increasing antibody-peptide near-native success from 41% to 59%. Analysis of AlphaFold confidence scores and modeling of a noncanonical complex provided further insights into predictive performance. These results highlight considerations for predictive antibody and TCR complex modeling efforts, while revealing key distinctions among protocols, scoring, and immune complex classes.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ImmunoInformatics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.6%
3
mAbs
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.5%
4
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.5%
5
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.6%
7
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.4%
8
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.4%
9
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
10
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.7%
12
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
140 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
13
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
14
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
16
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.0%
19
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.9%
20
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.6%