Back

The effect of parental provisioning on the development of prey preferences in great tit (Parus major)

Nevala, L.; Irving, C. J.; Thorogood, R.; Ruuskanen, S.; Hämäläinen, L.

2026-07-08 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.07.03.736371 bioRxiv
Show abstract

To make adaptive foraging decisions, naive individuals need to gather information about the local prey community. Besides sampling prey personally, the young could gather information about prey profitability by observing the foraging behaviour of other individuals, and parental provisioning provides the first opportunity to acquire this social information. Still, previous research on vertical transmission of prey preferences from parents has provided mixed results that are often confounded with other information sources, such as siblings and peers. It is also not known whether information from parents can change potential innate biases against certain prey types, such as avoidance of warningly coloured insects. Here, we tested whether social information acquired by offspring during parental provisioning influences the development of prey preferences in a generalist predator, the Great Tit (Parus major). We brought 15 great tit broods and their parents into captivity at late nestling stage (14 days old) and divided them into three social information treatments where parents were provided with either brown, red or yellow palatable maggots to feed to their dependent young for 8 days. Once foraging independently from parents, we conducted a preference test where juveniles were offered the full array of coloured maggots. Regardless of palatable exposure to typical warning-coloured maggots (i.e. red and yellow), juveniles consistently preferred yellow over red, and preferred brown maggots the most (i.e. lacking warning coloration). This supports the existence of innate biases against typical warning colours, and that social information from parents is unlikely to override these, at least when alternative prey is easily available.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Animal Behaviour
73 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
30.7%
2
Behavioral Ecology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
3
Ethology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
4
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.7%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.2%
7
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
8
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
9
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
10
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
11
Animal Cognition
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
13
Biology Letters
76 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
16
Integrative Organismal Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
17
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
18
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
19
Behavioural Processes
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
The Journal of Experimental Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
21
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
22
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Integrative and Comparative Biology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
24
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%