Back

Expanding all-α-helical protein space through rational computational design

Albanese, K. I.; Chubb, J. J.; Gutierrez-Rus, L. I.; Leng, X.; Kurgan, K. W.; Mylemans, B.; Ozga, K.; Petrenas, R.; Romanyuk, A. V.; Acevedo-Jake, A. M.; Roca-Martinez, J.; Cross, S. J.; Anderson, J. L. R.; Clayden, J.; Leggett, G. J.; McManus, J. J.; Oliver, T. A. A.; Orengo, C. A.; Scrutton, N. S.; Wilson, A. J.; Boyle, A. L.; Woolfson, D. N.

2026-07-09 synthetic biology
10.64898/2026.07.03.736327 bioRxiv
Show abstract

De novo protein design is advancing rapidly1,2. This is being driven by AI to generate protein backbones, sequences, and structural models3-7. As a result, de novo designed proteins are becoming larger and more complex8-10, and increasingly explore new protein structures11,12. By contrast, natural proteins have evolved structural and functional complexity by modular combination of recurring protein domains13. Approximately 25% of these natural domains are mostly -helical structures14. Here we show how these can be expanded using rational computational design. Following the domain classification scheme CATH15, we build complex all- de novo proteins hierarchically using sequence-to-structure relationships for helix-helix interactions, systematic rules to connect helices, computational tools to design loops, and in silico evaluation. The pipeline starts with a target architecture of free-standing helices. These are connected into a topology by considering local arrangements of helical bundles using understood sequence-to-structure relationships for helix packing. Single-chain sequences are completed using template- and AI-based methods. Finally, AlphaFold models are assessed to give small numbers of designs for experimental validation. We test 31 designs for 14 different architectures and 25 topologies. 75% of these express as stable, monomeric, water-soluble proteins; and >30% yield X-ray crystal structures matching the designs to atomic accuracy and with new-to-nature structures. Finally, several of the scaffolds are functionalised through one-shot designs to deliver ion, small-molecule and protein binders.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 4%
26.7%
2
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
13.2%
3
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.7%
4
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.2%
6
Nature Biotechnology
172 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
7
Nature Chemical Biology
119 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.1%
8
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
93 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.8%
9
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
10
Journal of the American Chemical Society
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
11
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Structure
193 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
14
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.9%
15
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Chemical Science
73 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
17
Trends in Biotechnology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
18
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
19
Nature Computational Science
55 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 34%
1.1%
21
ACS Central Science
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
Nature Chemistry
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
Cell Chemical Biology
94 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Journal of Molecular Biology
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%