Expanding all-α-helical protein space through rational computational design
Albanese, K. I.; Chubb, J. J.; Gutierrez-Rus, L. I.; Leng, X.; Kurgan, K. W.; Mylemans, B.; Ozga, K.; Petrenas, R.; Romanyuk, A. V.; Acevedo-Jake, A. M.; Roca-Martinez, J.; Cross, S. J.; Anderson, J. L. R.; Clayden, J.; Leggett, G. J.; McManus, J. J.; Oliver, T. A. A.; Orengo, C. A.; Scrutton, N. S.; Wilson, A. J.; Boyle, A. L.; Woolfson, D. N.
Show abstract
De novo protein design is advancing rapidly1,2. This is being driven by AI to generate protein backbones, sequences, and structural models3-7. As a result, de novo designed proteins are becoming larger and more complex8-10, and increasingly explore new protein structures11,12. By contrast, natural proteins have evolved structural and functional complexity by modular combination of recurring protein domains13. Approximately 25% of these natural domains are mostly -helical structures14. Here we show how these can be expanded using rational computational design. Following the domain classification scheme CATH15, we build complex all- de novo proteins hierarchically using sequence-to-structure relationships for helix-helix interactions, systematic rules to connect helices, computational tools to design loops, and in silico evaluation. The pipeline starts with a target architecture of free-standing helices. These are connected into a topology by considering local arrangements of helical bundles using understood sequence-to-structure relationships for helix packing. Single-chain sequences are completed using template- and AI-based methods. Finally, AlphaFold models are assessed to give small numbers of designs for experimental validation. We test 31 designs for 14 different architectures and 25 topologies. 75% of these express as stable, monomeric, water-soluble proteins; and >30% yield X-ray crystal structures matching the designs to atomic accuracy and with new-to-nature structures. Finally, several of the scaffolds are functionalised through one-shot designs to deliver ion, small-molecule and protein binders.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.