Back

MIRA-Net: A Cross-Cohort Representation Learning Framework for Parkinson's Disease Classification Using Acoustic and Beta-Band MEG Biomarkers

Akhila, N.; Ekbal, A.; Roy, D.

2026-07-06 health informatics
10.64898/2026.07.03.26357258 medRxiv
Show abstract

Accurate diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD) remains challenging due to substantial inter-subject variability and the absence of widely accessible, objective multimodal biomarkers. Although speech and magnetoencephalography (MEG) biomarkers have individually demonstrated strong discriminative potential, their joint utilization is constrained by the absence of subject-level paired datasets - a fundamental gap that has prevented cross-modal validation at the individual level. We argue that this makes cross-cohort representation learning not merely a pragmatic workaround, but the most realistic and clinically transferable framework for multimodal PD assessment. In real-world deployment, acoustic screening and neuroimaging biomarkers are acquired through separate clinical pathways and must be integrated across heterogeneous patient populations. To address this, we propose MIRA-Net (Modality-Invariant Residual Adversarial Network). This cross-cohort representation learning framework integrates acoustic speech features from four established UCI datasets (n = 193) with beta-band MEG biomarkers from the NatMEG-PD dataset (n = 127) for PD classification. MIRA-Net employs RF-SHAP feature selection, gradient-reversal-based domain adaptation, and supervised contrastive alignment to learn participant-independent, modality-invariant embeddings. The framework is evaluated under Rest, Go, and Passive task conditions against Early Fusion, Vanilla DANN, and Supervised Contrastive Learning baselines. MIRA-Net achieves a peak accuracy of 86.23% (Go condition, Stacking classifier) with AUC values exceeding 0.88 under repeated cross-validation, alongside a sensitivity of 89.4% and specificity of 83.1%. Friedman tests confirm statistically significant performance differences among fusion strategies (p < 0.003 across all conditions). These results demonstrate that cross-cohort representation learning can extract robust disease-discriminative signatures without synchronized multimodal recordings, offering a practical pathway toward AI-assisted PD assessment in resource-constrained clinical settings.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Parkinson's Disease
105 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.3%
2
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 8%
7.7%
4
Annals of Neurology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
5
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.1%
6
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.1%
7
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
9
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.1%
11
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
12
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
13
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
14
Neurobiology of Aging
107 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.3%
15
Experimental Neurology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
16
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
17
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
19
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
20
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
21
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
22
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
23
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
24
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
26
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.8%
27
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Nature Biomedical Engineering
47 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
30
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%