Back

Decision support for preventing elective surgery cancellations: cost-sensitive risk ranking with cross-site validation in the NHS

Chizari, H.; Peter, N.; Lin, B.; Malekinezhad, F.; Pietroni, M.

2026-07-06 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.07.03.26357241 medRxiv
Show abstract

Elective surgery late cancellations and ``did not attend'' (LCDNA) events waste theatre capacity, lengthen waiting lists, and impose avoidable costs on NHS Trusts. We present a decision-support approach that ranks upcoming elective procedures by expected cancellation cost and supports capacity-constrained outreach by selecting the highest-risk Top-K cases for intervention. Using cost-sensitive learning and a clinically grounded cost model, the policy reduces expected cost from approximately 103 GBP per case under business-as-usual to 77.08 GBP per case in a hospital-holdout (cross-site) evaluation designed to mimic deployment to a new hospital. In a complementary time-forward evaluation, representing prospective use within the same service environment, expected cost falls further to 70.97 GBP per case. The 6.11 GBP per-case difference between the two regimes highlights the added uncertainty introduced by cross-site operational shift and supports a conservative roll-out with local calibration and monitoring. Explainability analyses suggest that booking-to-procedure lead time, specialty or service line, calendar effects, and prior cancellation history are the strongest drivers of prediction, helping to inform tiered intervention workflows that prioritise near-term bookings and use model--pathway mismatches as an audit signal. Overall, the framework turns predictive performance into practical, capacity-aware policy guidance for reducing avoidable cancellations while supporting safe and equitable implementation.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 20%
8.7%
2
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.1%
3
BMJ Open Quality
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.1%
5
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.1%
6
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.0%
7
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
8
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
9
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
10
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
11
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
12
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
13
Medical Decision Making
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
14
Health Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
15
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.4%
16
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
17
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.3%
18
Clinical Trials
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
19
Journal of Clinical Pathology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
20
JMIR Medical Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
21
Trials
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
22
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
23
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
24
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
25
Biometrics
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
26
Age and Ageing
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
27
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.8%
28
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
29
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Healthcare
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%