Decision support for preventing elective surgery cancellations: cost-sensitive risk ranking with cross-site validation in the NHS
Chizari, H.; Peter, N.; Lin, B.; Malekinezhad, F.; Pietroni, M.
Show abstract
Elective surgery late cancellations and ``did not attend'' (LCDNA) events waste theatre capacity, lengthen waiting lists, and impose avoidable costs on NHS Trusts. We present a decision-support approach that ranks upcoming elective procedures by expected cancellation cost and supports capacity-constrained outreach by selecting the highest-risk Top-K cases for intervention. Using cost-sensitive learning and a clinically grounded cost model, the policy reduces expected cost from approximately 103 GBP per case under business-as-usual to 77.08 GBP per case in a hospital-holdout (cross-site) evaluation designed to mimic deployment to a new hospital. In a complementary time-forward evaluation, representing prospective use within the same service environment, expected cost falls further to 70.97 GBP per case. The 6.11 GBP per-case difference between the two regimes highlights the added uncertainty introduced by cross-site operational shift and supports a conservative roll-out with local calibration and monitoring. Explainability analyses suggest that booking-to-procedure lead time, specialty or service line, calendar effects, and prior cancellation history are the strongest drivers of prediction, helping to inform tiered intervention workflows that prioritise near-term bookings and use model--pathway mismatches as an audit signal. Overall, the framework turns predictive performance into practical, capacity-aware policy guidance for reducing avoidable cancellations while supporting safe and equitable implementation.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Validation of ‘Patient Optimizer’ (POP) Algorithms for Predicting Surgical Risk with Machine Learning 95%
- A Multi-Granular Stacked Regression for Forecasting Long-Term Demand in Emergency Departments 94%
- Addressing Label Noise for Electronic Health Records: Insights from Computer Vision for Tabular Data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Emergency department admissions during COVID-19: explainable machine learning to characterise data drift and detect emergent health risks 95%
- Using explainable machine learning to identify patients at risk of reattendance at discharge from emergency departments 94%
- Developing Machine Learning Models for Predicting Intensive Care Unit Resource Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A flexible method for optimising sharing of healthcare resources and demand in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- Sickness Absence Rates in NHS England Staff during the COVID-19 Pandemic: insights from multivariate regression and time series modelling 93%
- A Bayesian Susceptible-Infectious-Hospitalized-Ventilated-Recovered Model to Predict Demand for COVID-19 Inpatient Care in a Large Healthcare System 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Forecasting local surges in COVID-19 hospitalizations through adaptive decision tree classifiers 92%
- Multilevel and Quasi Monte Carlo methods for the calculation of the Expected Value of Partial Perfect Information 91%
- A Tutorial on Discrete Event Simulation Models in R Using a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Example 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.