Back

Modeling the Effectiveness of Antibiotic Therapies Against Sepsis Using Continuous-time Hidden Markov Models

Schmiegel, S.; Marchi, H.; Borgstedt, R.; Rehberg, S.; Fuchs, C.; Mews, S.

2026-07-10 health informatics
10.64898/2026.07.03.26357092 medRxiv
Show abstract

Patients suffering from sepsis need to be treated with an effective antibiotic therapy within the first hour after sepsis onset to decrease their risk of death. Microbiological data that provide information about the suitability of antibiotic therapies, however, is usually available only after 72 hours. Consequently, the treating physicians need to judge a therapy's effectiveness based on the patients' measured health records and their general health condition. This medical assessment is complex and requires years of experience. In our study, we investigate how statistical modeling can contribute to assessing the effectiveness of antibiotic therapies. To that purpose, we describe the effectiveness of antibiotic therapies by modeling sepsis patients' health conditions using a three-state continuous-time hidden Markov model (ctHMM). In literature, procalcitonin (PCT) and lactate have proven to be helpful for deriving the health condition in this context. The state probabilities obtained by the ctHMM are subsequently used to quantify the effectiveness of antibiotic therapies. To this end, we apply two different approaches, namely (i) averaging of the state probabilities and (ii) a logistic regression model. For (i), we calculate the average of the state probabilities for the state indicating a sepsis-free condition over an antibiotic administration period of 48 hours. For (ii), we use the information about antibiotic susceptibility testings as dependent variable in the logistic regression model; as independent variables, we calculate the difference between state probabilities at the start of antibiotic administration and 48 hours later. With this work, we are able to better understand the relationship between laboratory values, in particular PCT and lactate, and the patients' health condition. We further provide approaches for quantifying the effectiveness. Therefore, our work contributes to developing a clinical decision support system which helps physicians assess the effectiveness of antibiotic therapies in patients with sepsis. Supported by such a system, a physician is able to quickly adjust an ineffective therapy which avoids antibiotic resistances and increases a patient's chance to survive a sepsis.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.2%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.8%
3
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.3%
4
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
5
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.2%
6
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.5%
8
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
9
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
10
JAMIA Open
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
11
Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
12
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Applied Sciences
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
18
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
19
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
20
Expert Systems with Applications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
21
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
22
International Journal of Medical Informatics
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
23
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
24
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
25
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
BioMed Research International
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
Mathematics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
28
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
29
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
30
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%