Back

The SEA-AD DREAM Challenge: Community benchmarking human and AI agent solutions for Alzheimer's disease neuropathology prediction from single-nucleus transcriptomics

Lai, H.-Y.; Kalavros, N.; Chung, V.; Kaplan, E. S.; Anastassiou, D.; Cai, L.; Chen, E.; Garach Velez, I.; Gursoy, G.; Herrera, L. J.; Li, X.; Londin, E.; Loher, P.; Nazeraj, I.; Ortuno, F.; Ou Yang, T.-H.; Rigoutsos, I.; Rojas, I.; Andreoletti, G.; Foschini, L.; Heath, L.; Oskotsky, T.; Sirota, M.; Stolovitzky, G.; Travaglini, K. J.; Zou, J.; Gabitto, M. I.

2026-07-08 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.02.736180 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Single-nucleus transcriptomic atlases offer an unprecedented opportunity to connect cellular molecular states with Alzheimer's disease (AD) neuropathology, but whether these profiles encode reproducible, predictive information about pathological burden remains unclear. We present the SEA-AD DREAM Challenge, an open, international, model-to-data competition built on the Seattle Alzheimer's Disease Brain Cell Atlas to predict Alzheimer's disease neuropathological severity from single-nucleus RNA-sequencing data. Participants developed containerized models to predict categorical neuropathological staging, including overall Alzheimer's disease neuropathologic change, Braak stage, Thal phase, and CERAD score, as well as quantitative amyloid-{beta} and phospho-tau burden measured by 6E10 and AT8 immunohistochemistry. Across 17 eligible teams from 15 countries, the crowdsourcing framework enabled systematic comparison of diverse computational approaches and surfaced a broad landscape of modeling strategies and candidate predictive features. Top-performing methods achieved near-perfect prediction of categorical staging, with the best submission reaching a quadratic weighted kappa of 1.0 for the Overall AD Neuropathological Change score (ADNC), and competitive prediction of quantitative pathological burden in held-out data, with a best concordance correlation coefficient of 0.48. Post hoc perturbation analyses revealed that top categorical-stage predictions relied heavily on donor-level metadata-driven signals rather than transcriptomic features, whereas quantitative pathology prediction was more robust and supported by transcriptomic and cell-type-associated features with potential biological relevance to AD progression. The challenge also introduced the first AI Agent Track in a DREAM Challenge, providing an early benchmark for autonomous and human-guided agentic model development in single-cell neuroscience. This work demonstrates that single-nucleus transcriptomes encode substantial information about Alzheimer's disease pathology, establishes a reproducible benchmark for molecular neuropathology prediction, and highlights critical principles for designing privacy-preserving, leakage-aware community challenges using deeply phenotyped human brain data.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 5%
22.7%
2
Nature Neuroscience
252 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.1%
3
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
10.8%
4
Neuron
337 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
8.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.8%
6
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.3%
7
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 15%
2.4%
8
Alzheimer's & Dementia
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
9
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
10
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
11
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
13
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.5%
14
Nature Computational Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
15
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.4%
17
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.1%
18
Nature Biomedical Engineering
47 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
19
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 34%
1.1%
21
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
23
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
24
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
25
Nature Biotechnology
172 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
26
Nature Aging
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.6%