Back

Perspectives in conducting task-based research in pediatric surgical epilepsy patients

Leisawitz, J. P.; Georges, S. F.; Field, A. M.; Asghar, S.; Foox, G.; Watrous, A. J.; Weiner, H. L.; Anderson, A. E.; Hamilton, L. S.

2026-07-08 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.02.734030 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Objective: Pediatric epilepsy patients undergoing stereo-electroencephalography (sEEG) for ictal onset evaluation provide a rare window to study the developing brain. While methodological frameworks for task-based sEEG research are well-established in adults, pediatric-specific guidance remains underdeveloped. Furthermore, many pediatric epilepsy patients have comorbidities that might typically exclude them from participating in research. We examine factors that influence research participation and discuss considerations for conducting sEEG research in children. Methods: Here, we present a retrospective analysis of task-based research participation patterns from an NIH-funded study of speech and language representations (1R01DC018579) in 66 patients (ages 4-24) undergoing sEEG monitoring at Texas Children's Hospital to determine whether specific comorbidities influenced research participation. Results: Eighty-nine percent (n=66) of patients approached for consent agreed to participate in the study. Despite high rates of comorbidities including neurocognitive disorder (66.67%), language delay (31.75%), global developmental delay (23.81%), mood disorders (33.33%), ADHD (46.03%), autism spectrum disorder (14.29%) or other cognitive/intellectual disabilities (36.51%), all participants engaged in at least one task. While the majority of these diagnoses did not appear to influence subject participation, global developmental delay was associated with a significant reduction in time spent on active tasks. Discussion: Despite high prevalence of neuropsychological comorbidities among participants, our evidence suggests that these participants contribute meaningfully to studies investigating important developmental questions. We suggest strategies for tailoring task-based research to accommodate the unique needs of individuals in this population. Such practices are important for ensuring that research studies reflect the true diversity of the population.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 17%
11.2%
2
Epilepsia Open
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Autism Research
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
4
Epilepsy Research
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
5
Epilepsia
56 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
6
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
96 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Clinical Neurophysiology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.6%
8
Epilepsy & Behavior
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
9
Pediatric Neurology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
10
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
11
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
12
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
Molecular Autism
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
14
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
15
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.1%
16
The Cerebellum
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
17
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Pediatrics
32 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
23
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
24
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
26
Developmental Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
27
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%