Back

Feature Selection with Quantum Annealing for Biomedical Machine Learning Applications

Dudgeon, S. N.; Lee, S. J.; Durant, T. J.; Nelson, B.; Young, H. P.; Ohno-Machado, L.; Taylor, R. A.; Schulz, W. L.

2026-07-06 health informatics
10.64898/2026.07.02.26357174 medRxiv
Show abstract

Feature selection is a commonly used method in biomedical artificial intelligence and machine learning to identify a subset of high-quality variables that can be used to train downstream predictive models. It has been suggested that quantum feature selection (QFS), which takes advantage of the properties of quantum computers, may better identify variables that are correlated with the outcome while simultaneously reducing redundancy between selected variables. However, there are a limited number of studies evaluating their performance, particularly in real-world data sets. Here, we assess the performance of two QFS methods compared to random forest (RF) feature selection based on feature stability and the performance of a downstream classification algorithm when used to predict urinary tract infections in the emergency department from 211 original features extracted from the electronic health record. We found that a quantum binary quadratic model (BQM) and constrained quadratic model (CQM) had similar performance to RF feature selection (median F1 score of 0.60, 0.61, and 0.61 respectively) when 10 features were selected for an XGBoost classification model. The BQM and RF also had similar feature stability (0.91 and 0.94, respectively) while the CQM had lower stability (0.72). These findings show that QFS can be used with large, clinical data sets to identify features with high stability and predictive performance. As the capacity and quality of quantum computers continue to increase, these methods may offer additional benefits to classical feature selection methods.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
18.2%
2
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
3
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.7%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 29%
5.4%
5
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
6
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
7
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
9
JAMIA Open
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.4%
10
International Journal of Medical Informatics
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
11
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
12
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
13
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
14
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
15
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
16
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
17
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
47 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
18
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
19
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
20
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
24
JMIR Medical Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
26
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
27
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
28
Medical Decision Making
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
29
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%