Back

Exploring stakeholder perspectives on the content, delivery, and contextual delivery of shared decision-making for people living with subacromial pain syndrome: a multimethod study with future workshops and interviews

Lyng, K. D.; Johansen, S. K.; Foster, N. E.; Olesen, J. L.; Thomsen, J. L.; Soendergaard, J.; Rathleff, M. S.

2026-07-10 pain medicine
10.64898/2026.07.02.26356879 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Shared decision-making (SDM) is a key component in patient-centered care for people consulting health care due to chronic musculoskeletal pain, including subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS). Limited research has explored how patients, relatives, and healthcare professionals perceive the content and delivery of SDM for managing SAPS in primary care. Thus, this study aims to explore stakeholder perspectives on the content, delivery, and contextual requirements for a context-specific SDM intervention for SAPS, and to identify shared challenges and co-develop ideas to inform intervention development. Methods: We conducted three separate future workshops (patients/relatives, physiotherapists/chiropractors, and general practitioners), each consisting of structured critique, fantasy, and implementation phases. A rapid preliminary analysis of workshop data was followed by semi-structured stakeholder interviews to validate, challenge, or elaborate the findings. All data were analysed thematically using an iterative, reflexive approach. Results: Twenty-eight participants took part across three workshops: patients/relatives (n = 10), physiotherapists/chiropractors (n = 12), and general practitioners (n = 6). Six additional stakeholders provided inputs via subsequent interviews (three physiotherapists, one patient, one relative and one GP). Thematic analysis identified 20 themes and 59 sub-themes, which were refined into two overarching categories: (1) shared barriers to SDM in SAPS care, including diagnostic uncertainty, fragmented clinical care pathways, time constraints, and decision fatigue; and (2) stakeholder visions for future SDM interventions, emphasising continuity, tailored communication tools, and supportive digital ecosystems. Conclusion: Based on stakeholder input, SDM in SAPS care may consider integrating dynamic, integrated systems that account for diagnostic ambiguity, contextual constraints, and varying patient capacities. These findings provide an actionable foundation for co-developing and piloting a context specific SDM intervention for primary care.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 11%
17.6%
2
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
15.6%
3
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.4%
4
JMIR Formative Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMC Geriatrics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.5%
6
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.7%
7
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
8
Health Expectations
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
9
Pain
78 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.2%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
11
BJGP Open
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
12
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
13
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
14
Systematic Reviews
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
15
BMC Neurology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
16
JMIR Medical Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
17
The Lancet Rheumatology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
18
The Journal of Pain
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
19
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
20
Frontiers in Pain Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
21
Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
22
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
23
BJPsych Open
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
24
European Journal of Pain
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%