Back

Expert perspectives on improving services for patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures: a qualitative study

Gibson, H.; Chekar, C. K.; Goodwin, D. K.; Shelton, C.; Smith, T. O.; Johansen, A.; Aryaie, M.; Muruet, W.; Reed, M.; Evans, J. T.; Whitehouse, M.; Baxter, M.; Bottle, A.; Benn, J.

2026-07-04 orthopedics
10.64898/2026.07.01.26357068 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background The incidence of post-operative periprosthetic femoral fractures (POPFFs) is increasing. However, specific clinical guidance relating to patient management does not exist, resulting in variations in care and outcomes. This study aimed to elicit and synthesise expert knowledge in POPFF service delivery and explore views on variations in service provision and the factors influencing these. Methods Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with healthcare professionals with expertise in POPFF care from England and Wales to explore current practices, challenges, service variations and perceived future opportunities. Participants were identified through specialist research and clinical networks for POPFF and hip fracture care, authors of key publications on the subject, national leads for POPFF/hip fracture networks, and research team contacts. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. Results Ten interviews were undertaken with experts in POPFF services across a range of professional roles. Four themes were identified: conceptualisation of POPFF (by different professional groups and in different service settings) and understanding of POPFF patient needs; sources of variation in management and care of POPFF patients; service model rationales, advantages and disadvantages; and potential strategies to improve POPFF care. Conclusion When designing POPFF services, we suggest that four key areas need consideration: the extent to which POPFF patients are a distinct group with particular care needs; the necessity for and consequences of patient transfer between wards and hospitals; the resourcing of extensive multidisciplinary support for POPFF patients; and the need for national initiatives to encourage service developments. These findings should form the basis of future clinical guidance. Sensitivity to contextual factors driving variation in services is needed to ultimately improve care for POPFF patients.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.