Expert perspectives on improving services for patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures: a qualitative study
Gibson, H.; Chekar, C. K.; Goodwin, D. K.; Shelton, C.; Smith, T. O.; Johansen, A.; Aryaie, M.; Muruet, W.; Reed, M.; Evans, J. T.; Whitehouse, M.; Baxter, M.; Bottle, A.; Benn, J.
Show abstract
Background The incidence of post-operative periprosthetic femoral fractures (POPFFs) is increasing. However, specific clinical guidance relating to patient management does not exist, resulting in variations in care and outcomes. This study aimed to elicit and synthesise expert knowledge in POPFF service delivery and explore views on variations in service provision and the factors influencing these. Methods Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with healthcare professionals with expertise in POPFF care from England and Wales to explore current practices, challenges, service variations and perceived future opportunities. Participants were identified through specialist research and clinical networks for POPFF and hip fracture care, authors of key publications on the subject, national leads for POPFF/hip fracture networks, and research team contacts. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. Results Ten interviews were undertaken with experts in POPFF services across a range of professional roles. Four themes were identified: conceptualisation of POPFF (by different professional groups and in different service settings) and understanding of POPFF patient needs; sources of variation in management and care of POPFF patients; service model rationales, advantages and disadvantages; and potential strategies to improve POPFF care. Conclusion When designing POPFF services, we suggest that four key areas need consideration: the extent to which POPFF patients are a distinct group with particular care needs; the necessity for and consequences of patient transfer between wards and hospitals; the resourcing of extensive multidisciplinary support for POPFF patients; and the need for national initiatives to encourage service developments. These findings should form the basis of future clinical guidance. Sensitivity to contextual factors driving variation in services is needed to ultimately improve care for POPFF patients.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- UK osteopathic practice in 2019: a retrospective analysis of practice data 96%
- Development of the ECLIPSE model of meaningful outcome domains following lower limb amputation and prosthetic rehabilitation, through systematic review and best fit framework synthesis 95%
- The role of Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in pre-clinical spinal cord research: an interview study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Study of Patients undergoing Trigger Finger Release Surgery in a Primary Care setting – Organisational Capabilities, Outcomes and Benefits 95%
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 94%
- Integrating primary care and social services for older adults with multimorbidity: A qualitative study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and content validation of a questionnaire identifying patients’ functional priorities and abilities after hip or knee arthroplasty 95%
- Physiotherapists’ use of aerobic exercise during stroke rehabilitation: a qualitative study using chart-stimulated recall 94%
- Current Practice and Challenges in Screening for Visual Perception Deficits after Stroke: a Qualitative Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The preparedness and response to COVID-19 in a quaternary Intensive Care Unit in Australia: perspectives and insights from frontline critical care clinicians 94%
- Adverse event reviews in healthcare: What matters to patients and their family? A qualitative study exploring the perspective of patients and family 94%
- The Impact on Staff of Providing Non-Invasive Advanced Respiratory Support During the Covid-19 Pandemic A Qualitative Study in an Acute Hospital 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Self-Directed Learning Activities at King Abdulaziz University: A Qualitative Study of Faculty Perceptions 92%
- Navigating the Crisis: A Cross-sectional Survey Analysis of Resident Doctors' Experiences of Specialty Training and Employment in Today's NHS 91%
- Age Based Trends for Unplanned Pediatric Rehospitalizations in the United States 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.