Back

Epidemiology of antimicrobial use in Malawi: a cross-sectional study using World Health Organisation core antimicrobial use indicators in faith-based health facilities

Chirambo, E. C.; Chiumia, F. K.; Nkhoma, D. E.; Mitambo, C.; Thawani, A.; Msiska, T. L.; Odeo, S.; Asin, J.; John, M.; Chuaikan, W.; Angwe, M.; Khomani, P.; Chibwe, I.; Matchado, S.; Chimwaza, C.; Matchere, P.; Chiweza, B.; Mwenyekonde, E.; Kampira, E. K.; Kamanga, E.; Salima, Z.; Banda, C. G.; Makala, H.

2026-07-04 public and global health
10.64898/2026.07.01.26357065 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background : Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major public health threat globally, with a disproportionate burden in sub-Saharan Africa. Faith-based health facilities provide essential healthcare services to underserved populations, yet data on antimicrobial use in these settings remain limited. Aim : To assess antimicrobial use in Christian Health Association of Malawi health facilities using the World Health Organisation core medicine use indicators. Materials and Methods : A multicentre cross-sectional study was conducted in 29 CHAM health facilities across Malawi between January 2024 and June 2025. Data were collected from facility personnel, inpatient prescriptions, and patient interviews and analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results : Average availability of key antimicrobials was 33.1% (95% CI: 29.7-36.4), while customised formularies were available in 64.3% of health facilities. Among 660 prescriptions analysed, 90.3% contained an antimicrobial agent, but only 33.2% adhered to standard treatment guidelines and 43.6% were prescribed using full generic names. Facilities with pharmacy professionals were more likely to have a facility-specific formulary (84.6% vs. 46.7%, p = 0.037). Conclusion : Antimicrobial stewardship gaps remain substantial in faith-based health facilities in Malawi and across sub-Saharan Africa, highlighting the need for targeted stewardship programmes in faith-based health facilities.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
29.3%
2
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.1%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.7%
6
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.3%
7
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.3%
8
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
68 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.9%
9
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
10
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
129 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
11
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
12
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
13
Malaria Journal
58 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
14
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
15
Clinical Infectious Diseases
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
16
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
187 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
18
BMC Microbiology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
73 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
The Lancet Global Health
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
22
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
23
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Antibiotics
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%