Trends in medication abortion service delivery in the U.S., 2020-2025
Kaller, S.; Schroeder, R.; Berglas, N. F.; Stewart, C.; Upadhyay, U. D.
Show abstract
Objective: Since 2020, medication abortion provision in the U.S. has been reshaped by changing abortion policies and expanded telehealth access, yet little is known about how medication abortion service delivery has evolved. We examined national trends in service delivery from 2020 to 2025, including changes in abortion facility types, telehealth provision, and gestational limits. Study Design: Using ANSIRHs Abortion Facility Database, a national census of publicly advertising abortion facilities (2020 to 2025), we analyzed trends in medication abortion service delivery. Systematic web searches and mystery shopper calls gathered data on facility types, telehealth provision, and gestational limits. Data analysis included frequencies and comparisons across regions and states. Results: Medication abortion-only facilities increased nationally, from 35% of facilities in 2020 to 65% in 2025, with substantial growth in abortion-restrictive regions such as the Midwest and South. By 2025, 99% of facilities provided medication abortion. Telehealth provision expanded from 7 facilities in 2020 to 606 facilities by 2025, driven by growth in both brick-and-mortar facilities offering telehealth care and new virtual clinics. Overall, 46% of all facilities offered medication abortion by telehealth in 2025. Gestational limits for medication abortion increased nationally, from <1% of facilities offering medication abortion after 11 weeks in 2020 to 38% in 2025. Conclusions: Medication abortion service delivery has adapted to legal and logistical challenges by increasing telehealth options and expanding gestational limits. These changes improve access for abortion seekers, especially those living in restrictive environments. Sustaining abortion access will require ongoing provider adaptation and supportive policy environments.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Early medical abortion using telemedicine – acceptability to patients 97%
- Should COVID-specific arrangements for abortion continue? The views of women experiencing abortion in Britain during the pandemic 95%
- Attitudes towards the regulation and provision of abortion among healthcare professionals in Britain; cross sectional survey data from the SACHA study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- “ She helped from the first minute to the last ” – experiences of respectful maternal and newborn care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nampula Province, Mozambique 94%
- Use of machine learning methods to understand discussions of female genital mutilation/cutting on social media 92%
- Factors associated with contraceptive use among reproductive-age women during a pandemic: Evidence from a small developing state 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Translation, adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Abortion Attitude Scale - a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study among medical students 93%
- Couple-Centered HIV Prevention and Care: Endorsement, Practice and Uncertainty among US Healthcare Providers in Western-Central Upstate New York 92%
- Identification and Mitigation of High-Risk Pregnancy with the Community Maternal Danger Score Mobile Application in Gboko, Nigeria 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing contents for a digital drug adherence tool with reminder cues and personalized feedback: a formative mixed-methods study among children and adolescents living with HIV in Tanzania 90%
- Defining Destigmatizing Design Guidelines for Use in Sexual Health-Related Digital Technologies: A Delphi Study 90%
- Views and experiences of young people on using mHealth platforms for sexual and reproductive health services in rural low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative systematic review 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.